United States:
New York Law Journal: Realty Law Digest - August 5, 2015
11 August 2015
Herrick, Feinstein LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In his weekly Realty Law Digest column (subscription
required), Scott Mollen analyzes two notable cases. In 265 West
34th Street v. Chung, a landlord sufficiently stated a claim to
pierce the corporate veil. In Board of Managers of the Carlyle at
Lawrence Condominium v. Fortuna Fries, a scrivener's error of
notice of lien misidentified the fee owner.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Real Estate and Construction from United States
Chapter 1: The Bid
The Cromeens Law Firm
"I did not agree to do the electrical work. I never agree to do the electrical work." That's what Josh from Super Door Subcontractor told me after the general contractor on his community college project...
Construction Defects Coverage Update
Plunkett & Cooney
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit determined that an insurer had a duty to defend its insured on the basis that, at the time the insured requested a defense...
