United States:
New York Law Journal: Realty Law Digest - October 21, 2015
30 October 2015
Herrick, Feinstein LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In his weekly
Realty Law Digest column (subscription required), Scott Mollen
analyzes two cases. In Faison v. Lewis, the Court of
Appeals addressed the issue of whether a plaintiff's claim,
which sought to set aside and cancel a defendant bank's
mortgage on the grounds that the money had been lent in reliance on
a forged deed, was time-barred. In Howard Avenue Development v.
Richardson, the court found that the subject license agreement
provisions were akin to a lease.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Real Estate and Construction from United States
Chapter 1: The Bid
The Cromeens Law Firm
"I did not agree to do the electrical work. I never agree to do the electrical work." That's what Josh from Super Door Subcontractor told me after the general contractor on his community college project...
Construction Defects Coverage Update
Plunkett & Cooney
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit determined that an insurer had a duty to defend its insured on the basis that, at the time the insured requested a defense...