United States:
Patent Reviews Get Supreme Court Review
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Written by
Matthew Poppe
In a move that could have major implications for patent
litigation in the Northern District of California as well as every
other District, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to take up the
issue of whether inter partes reviews and certain other
America Invents Act proceedings are unconstitutional because they
can result in invalidation of a patent without a jury trial. We
invite you to read a full account, written by our colleague Don
Daybell, on Orrick's website
here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
USPTO Embraces AI Tools In New Guidance
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States" in the Federal Register (the "Guidance"). As the title suggests...
Breaking Down The EPO's Revised Practice Guidelines
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The guidelines for examination in the European Patent Office instruct on the practice and procedure related to the examination of European patent applications...
USPTO Issues Guidance On Use Of AI-Based Tools
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
On April 11, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued Guidance on Use of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tools (Guidance), which applies existing rules and policies...