United States: A Call To Arms - 365(n) And Trademark Licensees

Last Updated: May 16 2012
Article by Matthew J. Riopelle and Victor A. Vilaplana

Reprinted with permission from Portfolio Media, Inc.

Law360, New York (May 09, 2012, 2:33 PM ET) -- On April 11, 2012, briefing before the Seventh Circuit concluded on the direct appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's decision in Szilagyi v. Chicago Am. Mfg. LLC (In re Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Co. Inc.), 459 B.R. 306 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2011). In Lakewood, the Bankruptcy Court found support in legislative history to confer on a trademark licensee protections expressly not made available to such licensee by statute.

The debtor in Lakewood was a major manufacturer of box fans. Faced with continuing losses, Lakewood decided to outsource the manufacture of certain of its products including box fans sold under the Lakewood trademark. Lakewood entered into a supply agreement with Chicago American Manufacturing LLC (CAM) for the manufacture of the fans.

The supply agreement included a license to CAM of the Lakewood trademark in the event that Lakewood failed to purchase the amount of fans required under the supply agreement. The purpose of such provisions was to allow CAM to sell the fans under the Lakewood trademark which CAM had built under the supply agreement in the event that Lakewood ailed to by fans.

Despite its efforts, Lakewood was unable to operate profitability and an involuntary bankruptcy petition was filed against Lakewood. An order for relief under Chapter 7 was entered shortly thereafter and a trustee appointed. The trustee rejected the supply agreement which contained the "springing" trademark license. Subsequently, a dispute arose between the trustee and CAM regarding whether the trademark license to CAM survived rejection of the supply agreement. The bankruptcy court concluded that the license was not terminated when the supply agreement was rejected and that using its equitable powers it would ensure that CAM not be stripped of its "fairly procured trademark rights."

One would have expected that the trademark licensee would have been deprived of the ability to use the trademark under Lubrizol Enters. Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers Inc., 765 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985) and applicable nonbankruptcy law. Lubrizol is the well-known decision that held that rejection of a nonexclusive patent license deprived the licensee of further ability to use its patent and enabled the debtor licensee to enter into a new license post-petition.

The logic of Lubrizol (based on the Bankruptcy Code as it existed at that time) is compelling. Rejection constitutes a prepetition breach giving the nondebtor counter party a claim for damages but not any right for specific performance from the debtor. Further, the court in Lubrizol held that rejection relieves the rejecting debtor of the obligation to perform and, in the context of a patent license, performance means a waiver by the licensor of its right to sue the licensee for infringement.

Lubrizol was overruled in 1988 by Congress which, among other things added subparagraph (n) to Section 365. Section 365(n) conferred certain rights to licensees of "intellectual property" as the term is defined in also newly added Section 101(35A) of the Code. Among the rights granted to the licensee was the right to the intellectual property as it existed at the time of the petition in exchange for paying all royalties due.

Notably, however, trademarks were deliberately excluded by Congress from the definition of "intellectual property" in § 101(35A). Consequently, without the special preferred status conferred to a licensee of "intellectual property" (and to certain other classes of favored counterparties such as tenants, time share buyers, and others), one would have expected trademark licensees to be treated as any other nonfavored contract counterparty. Lakewood, however, concluded otherwise.

In considering the Lakewood appeal, the Seventh Circuit will evaluate the Lakewood court's reliance on so-called equitable powers which were suggested in the concurrence in In re Exide Technologies, 607 F.3d 957 (3rd Cir. 2010). Judge Thomas Ambro, in his concurrence, wrote that "a trademark licensor's rejection of a trademark agreement under 11 U.S.C. § 365 does not necessarily deprive the licensee of its rights in the licensed mark." Judge Ambro went on to cite legislative history regarding § 365(n) which said:

In particular, trademark, trade name and service mark licensing relationships depend to a large extent on control of the quality of the products or services sold by the licensee. Since these matters could not be addressed without more extensive study, it was determined to postpone congressional action in this area and to allow the development of equitable treatment of this situation by bankruptcy courts. S.Rep. No. 100-105, at 5.

Judge Ambro appears to have elevated this statement in a Senate report to nearly the status of a congressional enactment. Indeed, the Lakewood bankruptcy court described the Senate report as a congressional "call to arms" to the bankruptcy courts to devise protections for trademark licensees.

In contrast to the so called "call to arms," the Seventh Circuit must consider the fact that when Congress intended to grant broad equitable powers to the Bankruptcy Court it has done so expressly. In Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code, the court is required to determine whether a plan is "fair and equitable" and is proposed in "good faith."

In authorizing the assumption and assignment of a contract, the Bankruptcy Court is given broad latitude to determine whether "adequate assurances" have been provided to the non-debtor party. See 11 U.S.C. § 365. Yet, the Bankruptcy Code is silent as to equitable relief for parties to most rejected contracts, and express as to those favored counterparties who are entitled to equitable relief. In short, Congress well knows how to vest the Bankruptcy Court with powers to exercise discretion in dealing with various issues and it chose not to in the case of trademark licensees.

Although the authors are of the opinion that trademarks should receive some form of equitable treatment to avoid the harsh result of Lubrizol, the Bankruptcy Code contains no such protections and allowing the courts to fashion relief on a case-by-case basis will lead to inconsistent results and forum shopping. Accordingly, the Seventh Circuit should take the opportunity to send a message to Congress and the Bankruptcy Courts: that trademark licensees should receive protection but only by way of statute.

The Lakewood decision from the Seventh Circuit is much anticipated and will be extremely important for trademark licensees. It will, however, be even more important as a guide for statutory construction and the appropriate use of legislative history.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions