United States: Court Holds That Hannaford Data Breach Suit Cannot Proceed As Class Action

On March 20, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Maine denied a motion brought by plaintiffs in In re Hannaford Brothers Company Data Security Breach Litigation that would have allowed the suit to proceed as a class action. The decision, which concluded that plaintiffs had failed to meet the predominance requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), demonstrates the difficulty of certifying a class in the data breach context, where claims often turn on individual issues of causation and damages. Perhaps most significantly, the decision signals that in order for data breach plaintiffs to meet their burden as to predominance, they must first obtain a supporting opinion from an expert.

The Hannaford case began in 2008, when a putative class of Hannaford customers filed suit against the company following Hannaford’s announcement that cyber criminals had stolen customer debit and credit card information from its network systems. Following rulings by the District Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and the Supreme Court of Maine, the claims against Hannaford were pared down to negligence and breach of implied contract, and the proposed class was limited to customers who, as a result of the data breach, made out-of-pocket payments to cancel their cards or obtain identity theft protection products.

On September 4, 2012, plaintiffs moved to certify the proposed class under Rule 23(b)(3). In order to certify a class under Rule 23(b)(3), a plaintiff must satisfy the numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy requirements of Rule 23(a), and must additionally show that “questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) (emphasis added). The court ruled on each of these requirements, but it was the court’s holding on predominance that was dispositive.

The court began its analysis of the predominance requirement by noting that although questions relating to Hannaford’s conduct were common to the class, the actual impact of the data breach – i.e., the specific mitigation steps each plaintiff took and whether he or she suffered a fraudulent charge – differed from plaintiff to plaintiff. The court acknowledged that previous certification decisions have turned on whether these differences are labeled as pertaining to damages or causation, but it described this “labeling distinction” approach as unhelpful. Instead, the court chose to focus on the practical reality of whether the trial would “work (or not work)” should it proceed as a class action.

Plaintiffs argued that the trial would be straightforward, because they would be able to show by statistical proof the total damages caused to the class. Specifically, they asserted that experts would testify by statistical probability what proportion of the mitigation costs incurred by class members were attributable to the Hannaford breach. They further argued that this evidence would enable a jury to award a lump sum damages award, which could then be administered to the individual claimants. By contrast, Hannaford argued that such a trial would violate the Rules Enabling Act, their due process rights, and fundamental principles of fairness, because it would deprive them of their right to cross-examine each class member. They argued that such cross-examination was necessary in order to ascertain whether the mitigation costs expended were reasonable for each plaintiff in light of the specific circumstances present for that individual, such as whether he or she suffered a fraudulent charge.

The court stated that although Hannaford’s position would be overly restrictive if construed broadly, it was clear that plaintiffs had failed to show “predominance” in this case. The court acknowledged that courts have certified classes in other cases based on the lump-sum-damages approach advocated by plaintiffs, but noted that in those cases, plaintiffs generally had already offered expert opinion testimony as to the ability to prove total damages to the class. Here, plaintiffs had not presented any expert opinion testimony stating that total damages could be proven by statistical methods – they had only represented that they could offer such testimony at a later time. The court added that it could not take judicial notice that there would be such testimony. In the absence of expert opinion testimony, the court held, plaintiffs had failed to support their contention that total damages could be proven by the statistical methods, and thus had failed to meet their burden as to “predominance.” Accordingly, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify the class.

The Hannaford decision has important implications for class actions, particularly those relating to data security. The variation in impact to members of a proposed class is not unique to the customers in Hannaford, but, in fact, can be found in almost every putative data breach class, where the existence of or details surrounding claimed instances of identity theft vary from person to person. Moreover, for plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking certification of data breach classes, the Hannaford decision prescribes a difficult path forward. Obtaining expert opinion testimony is often a challenging exercise, which plaintiffs will now be under greater pressure to undertake prior to obtaining any assurance from the court that a lump-sum-damages approach will be approved. Indeed, expending such costs at this early stage could prove risky, as there is no guarantee that the motion for certification will ultimately be approved. This is particularly true in light of other data breach decisions, such as the District of Massachusetts’ decision in In re TJX Companies Retail Security Breach Litigation, in which courts have held that individual differences as to causation or reliance precluded certification. Under Hannaford, however, plaintiffs in data breach cases will have no other choice – if they want their suits to proceed as class actions, they will have to obtain an expert opinion prior to certification.


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions