United States:
IPRs Are Constitutional! No Violation Of Article III Or Right To A Jury
10 December 2015
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In MCM Portfolio v. Hewlett-Packard, No.
2015-1091 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 2, 2015), the Federal Circuit held
that an inter partes review (IPR) does not violate Article III or
the Seventh Amendment. An analysis of the Court's decision can
be found on
Finnegan's Federal Circuit IP Blog.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
