With the automotive sector continuing to hum along and economy
growing at brisk pace, auto suppliers are always looking for
business growth (or maintenance) opportunities. This may come in
the form of relocating to a different area to be closer to a key
customer or expanding current facilities to meet growing
demands.
Often, when expanding or changing footprint, suppliers are
particularly focused on timing in addition to the location.
Although moving into a new space within the planned timeframe is
certainly important, it is typically a costly process that involves
significant financial risk. As such, suppliers should be careful to
not be so focused on the planned timeframe, that they leave money
on the table in the form of valuable financial incentives.
Instead, at the outset of a new project, in addition to the more
obvious considerations, suppliers should be thinking about what
incentives are available to help maximize the project’s
potential profits. After all, identifying and negotiating the right
combination of financial incentive programs early on in the process
will no doubt help suppliers eliminate or recoup some of the
substantial investment costs that come with expanding or adding a
facility.
So, when considering the next move in the due diligence process,
suppliers should be asking themselves: “Can we receive
reimbursements from the city or state to offset our costs?”
The answer could be yes. But, suppliers should not stop there. If a
supplier has more than one geographic location as an option, it
should determine whether other municipalities have better programs
available for its particular needs, as incentives come in a variety
of forms, such as tax abatements, grants and tax increment funding,
each being a specific "tool" for a particular
"job."
Assessing the availability of financial incentives early on is
monetarily important, but it also may help minimize the various
commitments that state and local governments request of the
supplier. Incentive packages are a two-way deal, and state and
local government often impose obligations or conditions on the
supplier’s ability to receive and keep the full incentive
package. These can range from specific job creation obligations,
including creation of specific quantities and types of jobs within
certain time constraints, to compliance with detailed project
development timelines.
Suppliers should keep in mind their development will benefit local
communities, and the local benefit will always be part of the
equation. The supplier’s state and local level contacts will
want to know what type of project it is, how much the supplier is
investing and how many jobs will be created. Certainly, the more a
supplier is "bringing to the table" for the community,
the more likely it is to drum up local support for a generous
incentive package. But, even if a project is relatively small in
scale or less "splashy" than others, suppliers
shouldn’t let that deter them from pursuing financial
incentives, as the project might still involve significant costs
that could still be eligible for incentives. No matter the size or
complexity of a project, it is always worth considering
whether incentives are available to help offset associated
costs.
Another important consideration when determining availability of
financial incentives may not be so obvious. While suppliers will
certainly be focused on what works for their business, employees,
and supply chain, they also should consider the role of the
property itself because incentives may favor certain properties
over others. For example, brownfield tax increment incentives may
reimburse you for certain costs, such as demolition, site
preparation and asbestos abatement that you may not incur if your
project were on a "greenfield." In other words, the old
adage of "location, location, location" holds true when
determining incentives. Because of the benefits to their
communities, local and state economic development departments are
often eager to support automotive suppliers in obtaining incentive
packages, particularly if the project involves redevelopment of
brownfield properties.
As you consider where best to expand your business, be sure to
assess at the very beginning how financial incentives fit into the
picture.
This article is reprinted with permission from Warner Norcross & Judd LLP. This article is not intended as legal advice. For additional information, please contact the author of this article.