United States: Despite No Allegations Of Bad Faith Or Tortious Conduct, Liberty Mutual Owes Millions For Breaching The Duty To Defend

Last Updated: September 22 2017
Article by Johanna Wills Clark

In Hyland v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., No. 1:15-cv-01264-JES-JEH, 2017 WL 3388161 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 7, 2017), the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment for breach of contract finding that Liberty Mutual ("Liberty") breached its insurance policy when it failed to defend a 16-year-old driver who caused catastrophic brain injury to her passenger. The court ordered Liberty to pay a $4.5 million judgment despite its policy limits of $25,000 and despite plaintiff making no allegations of bad faith. The ruling is on appeal.

1) The Crash

Kimberly Perkins' 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix was insured with Liberty. On the night of August 2, 2013, Perkins' daughter, Michiah Risby, drove the car to a party. Risby's friend, Miquasha Smith, ultimately obtained the keys to Risby's Grand Prix and left the party. Risby maintained that she did not give Smith permission to drive the vehicle, but Smith stated that she had permission to drive it. After leaving the party in Risby's Grand Prix, Smith picked up additional passengers, one of whom was Monteil Hyland. Around 1 a.m., Smith crashed Risby's Grand Prix into a curb and parked cars. Hyland suffered a severe traumatic brain injury as a result of the crash.

Smith received 12 traffic citations. She also had a restricted driver's license, was driving after curfew, and had more under-aged passengers in the car than was allowed. The police reported that Smith's version of the events that night "continue[d] to change." Smith's family did not have a car or car insurance.

2) The Negligence Lawsuit and Liberty's Coverage Investigation

Due to Hyland's severe brain injuries, his mother sued Smith for negligence. On receipt of the compliant, Smith's mother submitted the lawsuit to Liberty. Liberty asked Smith if, at the time of the accident, she had Risby's permission to drive the Grand Prix. Smith responded in the affirmative.

Liberty assigned the lawsuit to an attorney and began its investigation. Liberty received a call from Risby's mother, Kimberly Perkins, who repeatedly denied that her daughter had given Smith permission to drive the vehicle from the party. Liberty also took the recorded statements of Perkins, Risby, and Smith, which resulted in conflicting statements about whether Smith had permission to drive the vehicle. Risby stated that she did not give the keys to Smith, but instead gave them to another person. Liberty did not take a statement from that other person.

3) The Policy

The subject policy states the following:

Part A – Liability Coverage

  1. We will pay damages for "bodily injury" or "property damage" for which any "insured" becomes legally responsible because of an auto accident. Damages include prejudgment interest awarded against the "insured." We will settle or defend, as we consider appropriate, any claim or suit asking for these damages. In addition to our limit of liability, we will pay all defense costs we incur. Our duty to settle or defend ends when our limit of liability for this coverage has been exhausted by payment of judgments or settlements. We have no duty to defend any suit or settle any claim for "bodily injury" or "property damage" not covered under this policy.
  2. "Insured" as used in this Part means:
    1. You or any "family member" ...
    2. Any person using "your covered auto".

Under "exclusions," the policy states that a person is not covered under the policy when:

  1. Using a vehicle without a reasonable belief that the "insured" is entitled to do so ....

4) Liberty's Denial of Coverage

Liberty determined that Smith did not have permission to drive the Grand Prix on the night of the crash and denied coverage. In a letter dated September 23, 2013 directed to Hyland's counsel and Smith, Liberty explained:

It is our understanding that, at the time of the accident, [neither] our insured nor her daughter Michiah Risby gave permission to Miquasha Smith to drive the vehicle. Accordingly, she could not have had a reasonable belief that she was entitled to drive the vehicle. Therefore Exclusion A. 8 applies to bar liability coverage for the accident.

And in another letter to Smith, Liberty stated:

If you have any information you believe may affect Liberty's coverage determination, please bring it to my attention immediately.

Neither Smith nor her counsel provided Liberty with contrary information.

Hyland's counsel thereafter sent a letter to Liberty with a copy of Hyland's negligence complaint against Smith and advising as follows:

This office will proceed to prove up a judgment against Miquasha A. Smith and issue supplementary process to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company concerning coverage of the vehicle in question.

Liberty wrote back continuing to deny coverage based on Smith's lack of permissive use of the Grand Prix at the time of the accident.

5) The Negligence Trial

The negligence action proceeded to trial. Smith stated on the record that she was defending herself, but she offered no evidence in her defense. Accordingly, the court found Smith liable for the injuries to Hyland and entered judgment in Hyland's favor. Liberty stood on its denial of coverage and did not provide a defense for Smith, defend Smith under a reservation of rights, or file an action for declaratory relief to determine whether it had a duty to defend Smith and/or indemnify Smith.

The trial court ultimately entered a judgment against Smith for $4,594,933.85. After the judgment was entered, Smith assigned to Hyland any and all claims she had against Liberty.

6) The Breach of Duty to Defend Lawsuit

Hyland, holding the assignment from Smith, filed suit against Liberty for breach of contract and breach of the duty to defend. Hyland did not allege any bad faith or tortious conduct against Liberty. Hyland simply alleged that Liberty had a duty to defend Smith and breached that duty by 1) refusing to defend Smith, 2) refusing to defend Smith under a reservation of rights, and 3) refusing to file a declaratory relief action to determine the coverage dispute. Hyland's suit focused on the allegations of her negligence complaint, which did not make any allegation of whether Smith had permission to drive the vehicle. As such, the complaint triggered Liberty's duty to defend Smith. Hyland alleged the direct and proximate result of Liberty's breach of its duty to defend Smith was a judgment of damages in the amount of $4.5 million.

The parties moved for summary judgment. But Liberty no longer contested that it had breached the duty to defend and instead focused on the damages Hyland sought. Liberty claimed that it only owed Hyland $25,000, the policy limits. Liberty contended that 1) Hyland had not alleged bad faith, 2) Smith did not incur any out of pocket defense costs, 3) the refusal to defend did not cause the default judgment, and 4) $4.5 million would be an impermissible windfall because it is "far beyond" the $25,000 that Smith would have been entitled to had Liberty not breached the contract.

The district court disagreed with Liberty and granted Hyland's motion for summary judgment. First addressing the duty to defend, the court explained that the complaint against Smith in the negligence action alleged that the vehicle involved in the accident was a "2004 Pontiac Grand Prix driven by Miquasha Smith," which is the covered automobile as listed in the declaration page of the subject policy. The court also noted that the initial lawsuit was "silent on the issue of permissive use." Accordingly, Smith could have fallen within the coverages of the policy which was enough to trigger Liberty's duty to defend Smith.

Second, the court determined that even in the absence of bad faith, the damages from failing to defend were "measured by the consequences proximately caused by the breach." The court held that the $4.5 million awarded to Hyland in the negligence action were "proximately caused by the breach" of the duty to defend and were not "unforeseeable" because when Liberty refused to defend Smith, Liberty knew that Hyland was pursuing a default judgment against Smith.

7) The Take Away

If it stands on appeal, this decision will serve as a warning of sorts to liability insurers. Where a question of coverage exists, the insurer should take steps to preserve its right to contest coverage, whether under a reservation of rights and/or by filing a declaratory judgment action to determine coverage. As the opinion highlights, simply denying coverage based on a policy exclusion and taking no action could result in exposure to a judgment millions of dollars over the policy limits, even absent any allegations of bad faith or any tortious conduct on the part of the insurer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions