"Workplace wellness programs cover over 50 million workers and are intended to reduce medical spending, increase productivity, and improve well-being. Yet, limited evidence exists to support these claims," conclude three university researchers in a newly published study.

Damon Jones (University of Chicago), Julian Reif (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), and David Molitor (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) designed and implemented a comprehensive workplace wellness program for a large employer with over 12,000 employees, randomly assigning program eligibility and financial incentives at the individual level. Over 56% of eligible employees participated in the program.

The researchers noted that, during the year prior to the program's inception, program participants had lower medical expenditures and healthier behaviors than nonparticipants. However, they did not find "significant causal effects of treatment on total medical expenditures, health behaviors, employee productivity, or self-reported health status in the first year."

Wellness programs may, however, "act as a screening mechanism," the researchers concluded: "[E]ven in the absence of any direct savings, differential recruitment or retention of lower-cost participants could result in net savings for employers." In other words, if the existence of a wellness program helps to attract and retain healthier employees, then employers could see a reduction in their healthcare costs as a result.

The study results were published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in a January 2018 working paper and are available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.