United States:
Courts Are Closely Following Amended Rule 37(e)'s Limits On Sanctions For Lost ESI
07 February 2018
Jones Day
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Within two years of its implementation, several cases show that
amended Rule 37(e) is having its intended impact, as judges are
carefully applying the criteria articulated in the Rule prior to
ordering curative measures or imposing sanctions. This Jones Day
White Paper examines Rule 37(e) cases decided over the past year
and explains why proper litigation holds are the first step for
minimizing the risk of sanctions.
Read the full White Paper.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...