We reported on a bunch of eye-popping punitive awards in 2017. There have been further developments in a number of those cases. Though we may provide more comprehensive discussions of some of those developments, here is a quick update.

On January 3, we reported on two large punitive awards returned by Missouri juries—a $10 million award against Orkin that was 82 times the compensatory damages, and a $20 million award against American Family Insurance that was 44 times the compensatory damages.

Shockingly, the trial court in the Orkin case allowed the punitive damages to stand. Orkin has appealed.

In the American Family case, the trial court, applying Missouri's statutory cap, reduced the punitive damages to five times the compensatory damages. For purposes of the cap, the court included in the denominator, not just the jury's award of compensatory damages, but also attorneys' fees, costs, and front pay awarded by the court post-verdict. The court then concluded that the resulting reduced punitive award of $8.4 million was not unconstitutionally excessive under BMW and State Farm. American Family appealed, but later dismissed the appeal, presumably as the result of a settlement.

On April 18, we reported on a $45 million exaction in a bankruptcy proceeding, $40 million of which the court ordered to be paid to consumer groups and law schools selected by the Bankruptcy Court. The parties thereafter settled the case with the defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiffs a confidential amount that substantially exceeds the $6 million that the court had awarded to the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs agreeing to pay $600,000 pre-tax to the designated consumer groups and law schools.

On May 2, 2017, we reported on a $17.5 million punitive award against Johnson & Johnson that was seven times the compensatory damages. The trial court did not deem the punitive damages to be excessive, but nonetheless reduced the exaction to $12.5 million under New Jersey's statutory cap. Both parties have appealed.

On May 12, we reported on a $105 million punitive award against Johnson & Johnson that was closed to 20 times the compensatory damages. Amazingly, the trial court let that monstrosity stand. J&J has appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals.

On August 30, we reported on a $150 million punitive verdict against AbbVie in a case in which the jury awarded no compensatory damages. Finding the jury's verdicts "logically incompatible," the federal district court ordered a new trial.

On September 5, we reported on a $347 million punitive award against Johnson & Johnson in a case in which the jury also awarded $70 million in compensatory damages. The trial court granted J&J judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, a new trial as to both the underlying torts and punitive liability. Both parties have appealed.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2018. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.