United States:
Josh Goldberg, Cory Bell, And Kevin Rodkey On The Supreme Court's Decision In SAS Institute v. Iancu
04 May 2018
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In SAS Institute v. Iancu, the Supreme Court addressed the
question of, "[w]hen the Patent Office initiates an inter
partes review, must it resolve all of the claims in the case, or
may it choose to limit its review to only some of them?" The
Court found that, contrary to the prior USPTO practice, the Board
may not limit institution to only some of the challenged claims.
Finnegan attorneys Joshua Goldberg, Kevin Rodkey, and Cory Bell
join us now to discuss what happens now.
To listen to the podcast click
here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
