United States: U.S. Supreme Court Defends State Sovereignty Via Anti-Commandeering Doctrine

Cannabis legalization advocates view the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Murphy v. NCAA, Nos. 16-476, 16-477, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2805 (May 14, 2018) as a harbinger of good news for their movement. The core tenets of Murphy relied exclusively on principles of federalism to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a federal law that regulated sports gambling, and analyze what effect, if any, Murphy will have on the burgeoning cannabis industry and related state regulatory landscape.

The Murphy Decision
PASPA's most important provision, which was directly at issue in Murphy, specifically made it "unlawful" for a state "to sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize by law or compact ... a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme based ... on" competitive sporting events − but only if this is done "pursuant to the law or compact of a governmental entity." PASPA, however, did not make sports betting a federal crime. Instead, enforcement of these prohibitions was to be carried out by the Attorney General and sports organizations, which could be deputized to bring civil enforcement actions to enjoin violations.

Certain states, such as Nevada, had established sports gambling schemes that were "grandfathered" into PASPA. New Jersey was provided an opportunity to receive an exemption if it could pass legislation legalizing sports gambling within one year of the PASPA's effective date. However, New Jersey's electorate did not vote to amend the state's constitution to permit sports betting until 2011, which was well after the safe harbor period expired. In 2014, the New Jersey legislature repealed its previous statutes prohibiting sports betting in the state, and the major professional sports leagues together with the NCAA initiated the Murphy action against several New Jersey officials in federal court to prevent sports betting in Atlantic City.

As an initial matter, Justice Alito, writing for the majority of the Court in Murphy, decided that when a state completely or partially repeals old laws banning sports gambling, as New Jersey did, the state "authorizes" that activity, just as if the state had passed a law to explicitly permit that activity. More importantly, the Court found that the PASPA violated the "anti-commandeering" principle, and was therefore unconstitutional. The anti-commandeering rule is a relatively new creation of judicial construction (i.e., it does not explicitly appear anywhere in the Constitution). Central to the Court's reasoning was PASPA's prohibition on state authorization of sports gambling. The Court found this conscription to "unequivocally" dictate what the state legislature may and may not do, thus running afoul of the anti-commandeering rule.

The anti-commandeering doctrine operates as a limit on the powers of the federal government pursuant to the Tenth Amendment's charge that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The doctrine, as stated in Murphy, stands for the notion that the Constitution confers power to Congress to legislate directly, but does not confer power on Congress to directly compel the states to require or prohibit certain acts, such as forcing states to enact and enforce a federal regulatory scheme. Without the protection of the anti-commandeering rule, the Supreme Court has posited, the federal government could effectively requisition the legislative processes of the states. Moreover, the anti-commandeering rule is thought to promote political accountability and prevent Congress from shifting the costs of regulation to the states.

The plaintiffs further argued that at least one of the challenged PASPA provisions (section 3702(1)) should be retained on the basis of federal preemption. Preemption originates from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which specifies that federal law is supreme over state law (when those laws are in conflict). The Court applied its preemption standard and noted that, for the PASPA provision to preempt New Jersey's state gambling laws, it must satisfy two requirements: (1) it must represent the exercise of a power conferred on Congress by the Constitution and (2) it must be "best read" as one that regulates private actors, not states. The Court had already concluded, in its anti-commandeering discussion, that the PASPA provision prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling was a direct command to the states, and not a regulation of private actors. Thus, the Court handily disposed of this argument, and found that the PASPA did not preempt New Jersey's new gambling law.

Cannabis, Murphy and Federalism
At the very least, Murphy is a signal that the Court is willing to protect state sovereignty from encroachment by the federal government by way of the shield of the anti-commandeering doctrine. The result in Murphy may have surprised some because the makeup of those justices joining the majority opinion included the most conservative of the Court. These justices were willing to sacrifice the entirety of the PASPA to protect New Jersey's interests, even though gambling is arguably morally hazardous behavior.

As a result of Murphy, states that have already legalized recreational and/or medicinal marijuana use, and regulated the same, likely need not be worried about federal attempts to repeal those laws through a federal mandate. The Court has made clear that Congress cannot strong-arm states and localities into enacting regulations, or prohibiting certain commercial activity. Congress may only legislate its own federal laws by regulating the conduct of private actors, not the states.

However, the Murphy opinion should not be interpreted as an invitation to challenge federal drug laws. Significantly, the PASPA did not criminalize sports gambling directly, whereas marijuana consumption, possession and manufacturing are prohibited by the federal government through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Central to Justice Alito's analysis was his finding that the PASPA did not regulate sports gambling as to individuals, but instead compelled states to do so. He observed that Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each state should be free to act on its own accord. For now, the federal government may lawfully regulate and criminalize drugs, including marijuana, through its commerce clause powers (which it has done by way of the CSA). This is a judicial position that is unlikely to change given the current status of commerce clause jurisprudence and the federal government's role in the drug war. Thus, the CSA would most likely survive a Murphy-type challenge.

Even so, as long as the conservative majority of justices on the Court champion and protect individual states' rights, the powers of the federal government will continue to erode. For the cannabis industry, this is good news − at least for now.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions