A Missouri federal judge recently denied certification of a proposed "slack fill" class action against the maker of "Mike and Ike" candy. The suit claimed that candy company Just Born, Inc. tricked consumers into thinking they were getting more product than they actually paid for by virtue of empty space ("slack fill") at the top of the boxes when they are opened. The court, however, held that because many putative class members knew and did not care about the extra space in the box and purchased the products anyway, individualized issues of knowledge, injury, and standing would predominate the action.

In White v. Just Born, Inc., 2018 WL 3748405 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 7, 2018), the plaintiff asserted claims under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) and for unjust enrichment based on the alleged slack fill in the defendant's candy packaging. According to the plaintiff, Mike and Ike box sizes lead purchasers to believe that they are getting more candy than they actually receive. The plaintiff moved to certify multistate and Missouri classes of candy purchasers.

District Judge Nanette Laughrey refused to certify the classes for a number of reasons. Primarily, Judge Laughrey reasoned that because an MMPA violation must still cause an ascertainable loss (i.e., an injury), to be redressable, determining whether putative class members knew about the alleged slack fill and purchased the products anyway was a predominating, individualized issue.  Likewise, purchasers who bought the candy with knowledge of the alleged slack fill did not confer an "unjust" benefit on the defendant, rendering the unjust enrichment class unfit for class certification as well. Judge Laughrey further held that the proposed classes' inclusion of persons who purchased the candy despite knowing how much space was in each box rendered the classes impermissibly overbroad and containing persons who lacked Article III standing to sue, given the absence of injury.

Judge Laughrey further noted the difficulty of identifying putative class members as most, if not all, purchases were made from third-party retailers and thus, no "master list" existed.  As a result, individualized evidence of whether a putative class member made a purchase would be required.  Further, whether each class member bought the candy for personal or household purposes--a requirement of the MMPA--presented predominating individualized issues as well. Judge Laughrey noted that the absence of a master listed impacted the ascertainability element. 

The White decision adds to the growing line of cases refusing to certify putative "slack fill" classes. See, e.g., Spacone v. Sanford, L.P., 2018 WL 4139057 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018) (refusing to certify a statewide class and holding that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to establish that he suffered an injury caused by alleged improper slack fill). Just Born also successfully moved to dismiss three putative slack-fill class action cases filed in 2017, and it currently is defending another slack-fill case filed in the Central District of California.

The plaintiff in White has petitioned for immediate appeal under Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.