United States: The Danish Conduit Cases: A Landmark Ruling On Withholding Tax And Abuse Of Rights

In an alarming development for some private equity funds, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) has issued two judgments in the combined N Luxembourg 1 (Case C-115/16), X Denmark (Case C-118/16), Danmark I (Case C-119/16) and Z Denmark (Case C-299/16) v Skatteministeriet and T Danmark and Y Denmark Aps (C-116/16 and C-117/16) (I'll call them the Danish conduit cases) which implies support for, or at the very least fails to quash, the proposition that the establishment of holding companies in Luxembourg and other European jurisdictions can be abusive and may not qualify for exemption from withholding tax under the Interest and Royalties Directive (2003/49/EC) or the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (90/435/EC, now replaced by 2011/96/EU), even where the holding companies are established on a commercial basis. This follows a recent decision of the Italian Supreme Court (No. 32255), which also denied the withholding tax exemption under the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, though for different reasons

The CJEU judgment does not actually decide the cases, which will now return to the Danish courts to interpret and apply to the facts in light of the typically Delphic pronouncements of the CJEU

There are slight differences between the fact patterns in the various cases, which will also be relevant to multinational companies and others that have made use of intermediate holding companies. The first case (C-115 and C-116) is relatively typical and will be a familiar scenario to those involved in private equity transactions. A consortium of private equity funds with a typically diverse pool of investors acquired a Danish company (a service provider). In order to make the acquisition, the funds set up a string of Luxembourg and Danish companies. The acquisition was partially financed by a loan from the funds to the Danish acquisition company. When Denmark introduced withholding tax on interest, the group reorganised so that the debt was acquired by one of the upper tier Luxembourg companies, which was itself financed by back to back loans leading back to the funds. The Danish acquisition company paid interest on the debt without withholding tax in reliance on the Interest and Royalties Directive. Following a further reorganisation, the Danish acquisition company paid dividends to another of the upper tier Luxembourg companies, this time relying on the Parent-Subsidiary Directive to escape withholding tax

SKAT, the litigious Danish tax authority, now asserts that withholding tax should have been paid and is seeking to recover it from the Danish acquisition company (or its successor).

Private equity holding companies

The question of the entitlement of private equity holding companies to treaty benefits is extremely topical in light of BEPS action 6, leading to the ongoing introduction of principal purpose tests (PPT) into a number of double tax treaties and the inclusion of new examples on this question in the commentary to the OECD model tax convention (see our article 'Tax issues on private equity transactions' (Brenda Coleman, Andrew Howard & Leo Arnaboldi III), Tax Journal, 7 November 2018). This judgment serves as a reminder that, at least in the eyes of several tax authorities, similar questions already arise under existing law, whether as a matter of domestic law or as a matter of interpretation of double tax treaties or EU Directives

Before going on to consider the CJEU judgment, it is worth looking at the question of intermediate holding companies from the perspective of a private equity fund. A typical fund will have a wide range of investors; many will be established in jurisdictions with a good double tax treaty network, such as the US, and/ or will be generally tax exempt, such as large pension funds or sovereign wealth funds. The aim of private equity structuring is to avoid the investors being subject to an increased level of taxation compared to direct investment. Unlike a large corporation, the fund will not have a natural home jurisdiction. The manager effectively has a free choice when it comes to determining which jurisdiction to establish the fund vehicle (commonly a tax transparent partnership) and any holding companies in. Both investors and financiers are likely to require that the fund makes its investments by establishing at least one holding company. Notwithstanding the impracticality of subjecting its investors to having to suffer withholding or claim exemption from withholding, it is not in any case practicable for a fund to simply invest directly into a target company.

The fund then faces the question as to where to establish the holding company. A number of European jurisdictions, notably Luxembourg, but including Denmark at one time, as well as the UK, have explicitly developed tax regimes which are favourable for holding companies. While tax will be a factor there are multiple other factors. Funds are likely to favour jurisdictions where they have a presence, and many funds have developed a presence in Luxembourg over time. It is common for such funds to make investments through Luxembourg holding companies even where there is no tax benefit (and often a tax cost) in doing so and some funds will structure all their investments through a master holding company there

Private equity funds have traditionally provided a significant portion of the capital for their investments in the form of debt. In many jurisdictions, within the limits permitted by transfer pricing, the interest on such debt would have been deductible against the business profits of the target. BEPS developments have now made it increasingly difficult to achieve deductibility for shareholder debt. Nonetheless, many structures still use shareholder debt due to commercial drivers such as the ease of repatriating funds by repayment of debt, and the priority afforded to debt claims in an insolvency. As a result, many funds have also established platforms in particular jurisdictions which they use to establish finance companies

Here, too, Luxembourg is a favourite jurisdiction: access to treaties and EU directives is undoubtedly a factor in that success. Such a finance company will typically have premises, and suitably qualified directors/ employees. It can be expected to make a turn which is more than sufficient to cover its costs. However, it should also be noted, as it was by Advocate General Kokott (the AG) in one of her opinions on the Danish conduit cases, that group finance companies, like holding companies, are not labour intensive: there is simply not very much to do during the life of a performing transaction.

Stepping back, though, there is little doubt that the use of Luxembourg and other holding companies produces a better tax outcome than direct investment out of the fund, both in light of the reduced admin, but also because while a significant majority of investors may otherwise be entitled to exemption from withholding taxes, this is unlikely to be 100%.

There is a question for the jurisdictions imposing the withholding taxes too. Is it a sensible exercise of their taxing powers to impose a gross tax, often at rates in the region of 30%, on foreign investment, bearing in mind the significant deterrent effect that is likely to have on such investment?

The OECD, beneficial ownership and conduit companies

The OECD has grappled with the question of treaty entitlement for holding companies for some time. It has been fairly clear since 2003 that naked treaty shopping – where a company in jurisdiction A, which doesn't have a treaty with jurisdiction B, simply interposes a conduit SPV in jurisdiction C, which does have an appropriate treaty – will not be effective. In that case, the conduit will not be the beneficial owner of the interest and so will not qualify for reduced rates of withholding. However, it is also fairly clear (on my reading at least) that this is only intended to catch the most egregious situations. Beyond that it is a question for the source jurisdictions, to whom it is open to address a wider range of situations through domestic or treaty based anti-avoidance provisions, on my reading of the OECD commentary to the model double tax agreement

The EU appeared to take a similar approach to the Interest and Royalties Directive and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, both of which made it clear that their terms should not 'preclude' member states from combatting fraud or abuse. On a plain reading, this appears to allow the member states' own anti-avoidance rules to override the directives but does not introduce a free-standing antiavoidance rule into the directives (though such a rule has been added to the Parent-Subsidiary Directive in 2015).

Denmark challenges both of these propositions, it apparently being common ground that Denmark's domestic anti-avoidance rules do not catch the situations it wishes to contest.

To read the full article click here

Originally published by Tax Journal

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions