United States: NLRB Eases Standard For Withdrawing Union Recognition Upon Contract Expiration

In a 3-1 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (Board) in Johnson Controls, Inc., 368 NLRB No. 20 (July 3, 2019), adopted a new standard that applies to an employer's anticipatory withdrawal of union recognition, and set forth a new framework for determining whether a union has reacquired majority status.  The Board's new model settles majority status disputes through a secret-ballot election when the employer and the union both have evidence supporting their positions.

The Board's new standard overrules prior precedent that permitted a union to defeat an employer's announced intent to withdraw recognition in an unfair labor practice proceeding by presenting evidence that the union reacquired majority status in the period between the employer's anticipatory notice of withdrawal and actual withdrawal.  Instead, under the new standard, evidence of a union's actual loss of majority support, if received by an employer within 90 days prior to contract expiration, conclusively rebuts a union's presumptive continuing majority status when the contract expires.  However, a union may attempt to reestablish majority status by filing a petition for a Board election within 45 days from the date an employer gives anticipatory notice of withdrawal of recognition.

Prior Process for Withdrawing Recognition

Under Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (Act), employers must recognize and bargain in good faith with unions that have been certified as the exclusive bargaining representative for an appropriate unit of employees.  Such unions enjoy a presumption of majority status for one year following the Board's certification (the "certification bar") and, should a contract be reached, have a conclusive presumption of majority status during the term of the collective bargaining agreement, up to three years (the "contract bar"). 

Under long-standing precedent, an employer that received evidence—within a reasonable period of time before its existing collective bargaining agreement expired—that the union no longer enjoyed majority support, may notify the union that it intends to withdraw recognition from the union when the CBA expires.  This is known as anticipatory withdrawal.  Although the employer must continue to comply with the existing contract until its expiration, it may suspend bargaining or refuse to bargain for a successor agreement.

Under the Board's decision in Levitz Furniture Co. of the Pacific, 333 NLRB 717 (2001), however, when the contract expired, an employer that made a lawful anticipatory withdrawal of recognition still acted at its peril by withdrawing recognition.  If the union challenged the withdrawal through an unfair labor practice charge alleging that the employer violated Section 8(a)(5) of the Act by withdrawing recognition and/or refusing to bargain, the employer had to prove the union lacked majority support when recognition was actually withdrawn.  The union could present evidence it reacquired majority status in the period of time between the anticipatory withdrawal and actual withdrawal of recognition.  Thus, the standard had been a "last in time" rule, as the union's evidence controlled the outcome even if the employer was correct that the union lacked majority status when the employer made the anticipatory withdrawal of recognition.

The remedy for improper withdrawal of recognition when the union had regained majority status before actual withdrawal usually included an affirmative bargaining order, which precluded any challenge to the union's majority status for a reasonable period of time.  In addition, if the parties then agreed on a new CBA, the union's majority status would again be protected by the contract bar doctrine for up to another three years. 

Withdrawal of Recognition in Johnson Controls and ALJ Decision

In Johnson Controls, the employer and the union were parties to a collective bargaining agreement running from May 7, 2012 through May 7, 2015.  Negotiations for a successor contract began on April 21, 2015. On April 21, however, the employer received a "Union Decertification Petition" signed by 83 of the 160 bargaining unit employees.  That same day, the employer notified the union of the petition, and announced that it would no longer recognize the union as the employees' bargaining representative when the contract expired on May 7—an anticipatory withdrawal of recognition.  The employer also informed the union it was cancelling the remaining bargaining sessions. 

The union objected and demanded that the employer continue bargaining.  In addition, the union collected new signed authorization cards and informed the employer it had "credible evidence" that it retained majority support.  The employer nevertheless withdrew recognition from the union on May 8.  Shortly afterwards, the employer announced several improvements to the employees' terms and conditions of employment, including a 3% wage increase and a match to the employees' 401(k) retirement contributions. 

On August 28, a group of employees filed a petition for decertification, but the union filed an unfair labor practice charge, blocking that effort.

At the ALJ trial, it became clear that six employees who had signed the April 21 decertification petition later also signed union authorization cards circulated by the union between April 27 and May 7.  However, four of the six "dual signers" testified that they did not want the union to represent them on May 8, which was the actual day the employer had withdrawn recognition from the union.  As such, the ALJ concluded that the union did not have majority support when the employer withdrew recognition on May 8.  The ALJ found that the withdrawal of recognition was lawful and dismissed the complaint, and the Union appealed to the Board.

New Standard for Anticipatory Withdrawal

In Johnson Controls, the Board shone a light on the myriad problems caused by the Levitz framework.  Under Levitz, even when an employer has made a lawful anticipatory withdrawal of recognition, it still acts "at its peril" by withdrawing recognition upon the contract's expiration because the union could defeat the withdrawal by providing evidence that, after anticipatory withdrawal and before withdrawal in fact, it reacquired majority status.  Thus, an employer could "unexpectedly find itself on the losing end of an 8(a)(5) charge." The remedy for this violation typically includes an affirmative bargaining order, preventing any challenge to the union's majority status, generally for six months to one year.

The Board also noted the often contentious and confusing times employees face under Levitz when asked to express whether they prefer union representation.  Under Levitz, the Board deemed determinative the employees' most recently made expression of union representation, i.e., the last in time rule.  This framework "creates an opportunity, if not an actual incentive, for incumbent unions to take advantage of the 'last in time' rule to extend the bar against challenges to its representative status for years to come, to the detriment of employees' Section 7 rights to choose a different bargaining representative or to refrain from union representation altogether."   Moreover, as seen in several recent cases, because unions were not required to provide evidence of reacquired majority status to employers prior to contract expiration, employers could violate the Act unknowingly, by withdrawing recognition where a union has covertly reestablished majority support.   

To remedy these concerns, the Board in Johnson Controls announced a new framework in the anticipatory withdrawal context to address questions about employees' representational preference—a Board-conducted, secret-ballot election, which is the preferred method of deciding such questions.  The Board explained that its new mechanism properly safeguards employee free choice about representation, and effectively promotes labor relations stability by ensuring fewer disruptions to the bargaining relationship.

Consequently, the Board modified the "anticipatory withdrawal of recognition" doctrine in two material aspects.  First, the anticipatory withdrawal must be made no more than 90 days before the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement.  Second, if the union wishes to attempt to re-establish its majority status following an anticipatory withdrawal of recognition, it must file an election petition within 45 days from the date the employer announces its anticipatory withdrawal.  If the union does not timely file an election petition, at contract expiration the employer may safely rely on its evidence of the union's loss of majority support.  If the union files a timely election petition, the employer may still withdraw recognition at expiration of the contract, since a secret-ballot election will be held to determine whether the union has reestablished majority status.  An employer, however, is not required to withdraw recognition at contract expiration.

Impact of the New Standard on Unilateral Changes

Generally, an employer violates Section 8(a)(5) of the Act by making unilateral changes to mandatory subjects of bargaining, such as employee wages and retirement benefits, while the union enjoys majority status.  Although in Johnson Controls the union did not challenge the employer's new benefits, the Board provided direction about the impact of its new standard on employers' post-withdrawal unilateral changes.  Even under the new standard, unilateral changes still "entail substantial risk."  The Board reviewed four scenarios:

1.  Unilateral change in gap period between contract termination and union election:  An employer that makes unilateral changes in unit employees' terms and conditions of employment during this intervening period would not violate Section 8(a)(5), since the employees' showing of disaffection will have rebutted the union's post-contract presumption of continuing majority status.  However, after the union files the election petition, such unilateral changes could constitute a conferral of a benefit on employees that destroys pre-election "laboratory conditions" by reasonably interfering with employee free choice (e.g., a wage increase appearing as a bribe to employees to vote against the union), and the Board could direct a second election. 

2.  Union loses the election and raises no challenges or objections:  If the union loses the election and does not either challenge an outcome-determinative number of ballots or file objections to the election, the employer may make unilateral changes.

3.  Union loses the election and challenges an outcome-determinative number of ballots and/or files objections:  In this scenario, the employer makes post-election unilateral changes at its peril.  If successful union ballot challenges swing the outcome of the election, the union's representative status would be established as of the date of the election, and the employer's unilateral changes after that date would violate Section 8(a)(5).  Alternatively, if the union were to prevail on its objections, the Board would direct a second election, and the employer's unilateral changes prior to that election could furnish grounds for the union—if it loses the second election—to file objections yet again and obtain a third election.

4.  Union wins the election and the employer challenges an outcome-determinative number of ballots and/or files objections:  Again, the employer makes post-election unilateral changes at its peril since it might not be successful in its challenges and/or objections.  Even if the employer succeeds in securing a second election, as explained above, its unilateral improvements to employees' terms and conditions of employment during the pre-election critical period could be fodder for the union to obtain yet a third election.

In short, while an employer may now safely withdraw recognition after the contract expires following a lawful anticipatory withdrawal, making unilateral changes before post-election proceedings have run their course poses considerable risks of not only violating Section 8(a)(5), with its usual remedies, but also of self-sabotaging a rerun election.


The new framework in Johnson Controls provides more clarity to the employer community about how to respond to employees' desires to oust union representation near the expiration of a contact. Though the circumstances in which Johnson Controls applies are relatively narrow, the Board has advanced employee free choice by requiring unions to demonstrate their majority status through a secret-ballot election, instead of allowing them to file ULP charges that may delay giving effect to employees' wishes for years to come.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions