United States: Overview Of Spring Term 2019 Supreme Court Tax Decisions

In its 2019 Spring Term, the Supreme Court published five decisions regarding tax matters, three of which limit states' taxing authority. In a February decision, Dawson v. Steager, the Court held that a state cannot tax a federal retiree's pension benefits while declining to tax a similarly situated state retiree. The March decision in BNSF Railway Co. v. Loos held that lost wages paid to a worker who was injured on the job constitute taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. Later in March, the Court held in Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den that a state tax imposed on a member of the Yakama Nation on importation of fuel via public highway is pre-empted by the 1855 Treaty Between the United States and the Yakama Nation of Indians. Then, in May, in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, the Court held that a state may not be sued in another state's court in a private suit, unless it waives immunity. Finally, the Court issued its decision in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Kimberly Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, covered in a separate Disputing Tax post available here.

Dawson v. Steager, 586 U. S. ____ (2019)

In Dawson v. Steager, the Supreme Court unanimously held that a state may not impose tax on pension payments to retired federal law enforcement officers while affording tax exemptions to retired state law enforcement officers. The petitioner, James Dawson, is a retiree from the U.S. Marshals Service, who received retirement income from the Federal Employee Retirement System. Under a state law, W. Va. Code Ann. §11- 21-12(c)(6), West Virginia exempted state retirement income its residents received from West Virginia police; West Virginia Firemen's Retirement System; the West Virginia State Police Death, Disability and Retirement Fund; the West Virginia State Police Retirement System; or the West Virginia Deputy Sheriff Retirement System. Dawson amended his tax returns for 2010 and 2011 to claim the exemption under the state law, but the state denied the exemption. Dawson appealed, alleging that the state violated the inter-governmental tax immunity doctrine of 4 U.S.C. §111, which prohibits discriminatory state tax based on the source of federal employees' pay or compensation. Specifically, under 4 U.S.C. §111, the U.S. consents to state taxation of the "pay or compensation" of "officer[s] or employee[s] of the U.S." only if the "taxation does not discriminate against the officer or employee because of the source of the pay or compensation." Therefore, a state violates this law when it treats retired state employees more favorably than retired federal employees while no "significant differences between the two classes" exist to justify the differential treatment.1 On this ground, the Court had previously invalidated Kansas tax that discriminated against federal retirees.2

In Dawson, the state argued that the exemption for state and local law enforcement pensions was not discriminatory because it impacted a de minimis number of retirees, did not meaningfully interfere with federal government operations, and was not intended to harm federal retirees. The Court rejected these arguments and held that if the state exempts only a narrow subset of retired state employees, the state can still be compliant with 4 U.S.C. §111 by exempting the comparable class of retired federal employees. Further, the Court held that in evaluating whether a state law is discriminatory, the state interest in adopting such law is "simply irrelevant."3 The Court also stated that the focus of the inquiry is whether federal retirees are similarly situated to state retirees who do receive tax breaks, not those who do not. The Court interpreted "similarly situated" as performing comparable duties.4 In response to the state's assertion that the distinction may be based on the relative generosity of pension benefits, the Court held that the West Virginia statute, as it is enacted, does not draw distinction on such basis and thus discriminates based on the source of payment. The Court further articulated that where there is an explicit unlawful classification in the text of the statute, a lawful, but implicit, classification does not render the statute lawful. However, the Court did not adopt a bright line rule on whether the federal retirees were "similarly situated" and performed comparable duties, and remanded the case.

The decision's immediate impact is that if a federal employee's job responsibilities were similar to a comparable state employee's, the state may not tax the federal pay or compensation without doing the same to state pay or compensation. However, the question remains as to how courts will determine whether federal employees or retirees are similarly situated to state employees. It is also unclear whether the decision will actually benefit federal retirees, or whether states with similar statutes will choose to instead tax state retirees.

For its part, West Virginia must take action. First, it may have to issue refunds to some federal retirees who submit valid refund claims if their job responsibilities were similar to the petitioner's and they had already paid the taxes on their pension income. Prospectively, West Virginia may repeal the exemption for retired state employees or exempt the retirement benefits of similarly situated federal employees.

BNSF Railway Company v. Loos, 586 U.S. ____ (2019)

In BNSF Railway Co. v. Loos, the Supreme Court held that lost wages paid to a worker who was injured on the job constitute "compensation" under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA), because the definitions of "compensation" in the RRTA and "wages" in the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) and the Social Security Act (SSA) are similar. Loos, who was injured on the job, sued BNSF Railway Company under the Federal Employers' Liability Act for withholding $3,765 of taxes from the $30,000 of lost wages awarded to him. Lower courts held that awards to injured railroad workers for lost wages are not taxable under the RRTA. Thus, the issue before the Court was whether payment of lost wages due to a railroad worker's on-the-job injury is taxable "compensation" under RRTA.

Even though compensatory damages for physical injuries are excluded from gross income under §104 of the Internal Revenue Code, the RRTA imposes a separate tax on "compensation." The RRTA and Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) define "compensation" as "any form of money remuneration paid to an individual for services rendered as an employee."5 This is similar to how FICA and the SSA define "wages," as "all remuneration" for "any service, of whatever nature, performed...by an employee."6 Under both systems, the taxes and benefits are measured by an employee's "wage" or "compensation." The Court concluded that the definitions of "wages" and "compensation" are materially indistinguishable, relying on earlier cases interpreting "wages." In the past, the Court has held that other types of employment-related payments constituted "wages."7 In line with this precedent, the Court held that "compensation" under RRTA and RRA includes payment for periods of absence from service, regardless of whether the employer chooses to make it or is legally required to do so.

The narrow impact of the decision is that settlement awards of lost wages for railroad employees will be taxable, and railroad employers must withhold on them. More broadly, the opinion signals that settlement payments for work-related injuries that are allocated to lost wages will be taxable, though the Internal Revenue Code explicitly exempts workers' compensation payments from the FICA tax.8

Footnotes

1 Dawson v. Steager, 586 U.S. ___, at *3, quoting Davis v. Mich. Dept. of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 816 (1989) (invalidating a tax on former federal employees' retirement benefits).

2 See Barker v. Kansas, 503 U.S. 594, 599 (1992) (invalidating a tax on federal military retirement benefits).

3 Dawson, 586 U.S. ____, at *5, citing Davis, 489 U.S. at 816.

4 586 U.S. at *6.

5 IRC §3231(e)(1); 45 USC §231(h)(1)

6 IRC §3121(a)-(b); 42 USC §§409(A), 210(a).

7 Social Security Bd. v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 (1946) ("wages" include payment for active service as well as periods of absence from service, including back pay for lost wages due to the employer's wrongful conduct); United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., 572 U.S. 141 (2014) (under FICA, "wages" include severance payments).

8 IRC § 3121(a)(2)(A); Treas. Reg. § 31.3121(a)(2)-1(a).

To view the full article click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions