Spain: Make or break time for Insolvency Law? Towards a Business Restructuring Law

Last Updated: 25 October 2010
Article by Antonio Fernandez Rodriguez

Insolvency Law can hardly reconcile business preservation and creditors satisfaction, so it usually sacrifices one or the other principle being therefore qualified as more or less debtor friendly. The question is whether preservation of business should take place in a prior stage, that of the pre- insolvency, leaving liquidation for the terminal insolvency situations. That would require broadening the scope of the Law, in order to include pre- insolvency solutions, the failing of which would lead to liquidation; we would be talking about a Restructuring Law instead of an Insolvency Law.

The traditional function of Spanish insolvency legislation has been linked to the orderly satisfaction of the creditors of an insolvent common debtor. It was thought that execution levied individually by creditors against the debtor's assets could lead to inefficiencies and unfairness, with a fire sale of assets to the most diligent or best informed creditors, or simply to those who were lucky enough to have their applications for execution heard quicker at courts with a smaller backlog of cases. For this reason, individual executions were replaced by compulsory universal execution against the debtor's assets in order to use the proceeds to satisfy creditors.

However, it soon became apparent that compulsory universal execution, despite being more orderly than individual execution, was largely prey to the same inefficiencies, since on entering liquidation, the assets, and particularly the business assets, suffered a spectacular loss in value leading to a diminished ability to satisfy creditors. Thus creditors were given the authority to decide whether to replace compulsory universal execution against the debtor's assets with an arrangement with the debtor that would enable the business to continue and its future profits to be used to achieve a better level of debt satisfaction.

This being the case, more recently new ideas regarding the purposes that Insolvency Laws should serve star ted to emerge as a result of the ever- increasing complexity of commercial and economic dealings in the 20th century and the highly sophisticated nature of economics as a discipline for the study of systems and structures of economies, in general, and businesses, in particular.

First of all, formal insolvency proceedings have begun to find their place within market economies, as opposed to planned economies, as an essential means of ridding the market of operations for which there is no demand, poorly organized under takings or operations which, in short, have lost out to business competition, thus reassigning the means of production used by them to other operations.

In this purgative function, insolvency proceedings play a secondary role, since the preferred remedy is for the trader to acknowledge its failure in time and to voluntarily realign its business approach before the trader's ability to satisfy its creditors in full is jeopardized. However, when the trader does not do so, formal insolvency proceedings are a coercive means to this end and are accompanied by scrutiny of the debtor's conduct in order to hold it to account for any liabilities it may have incurred by letting things come to a head.

Secondly, the idea that there may be aspects of general interest to the wider community in preserving the business infrastructure is beginning to take hold. The pains taken by modern States to preserve companies manifest themselves in many ways depending on the various reasons why it may be advisable or indeed necessary to preserve certain operations and on the intensity of the public interest perceived in them.

At the one extreme are those operations that are structurally loss making/inefficient but necessary for an acceptable coexistence, and which, not being viable according to free market rules, must be taken on by the State within the so-called public sector of the economy, normally as a monopoly. The preservation of these operations means that they fall outside the scope of formal insolvency proceedings, just as they elude free market rules.

Next along the scale, but by now subject to free market rules, are a series of operations which require a high degree of concentration in order to be efficient, thereby gaining a size and a systemic significance which requires, on the one hand, a certain degree of regulation by the public authorities and, on the other, a special regime to monitor their solvency, accompanied by "quasi-insolvency" proceedings (procedimientos "paraconcursales") with preservation being their aim and with a high degree of intervention by the authorities. These activities include regulated sectors, such as the banking and insurance industries, and there is debate as to whether large concerns should also be "above" business risk, avoiding conventional formal insolvency proceedings and falling within the scope of these preservation-oriented administrative processes (this avoidance of formal insolvency proceedings has caused many in recent times to again heed the axiom "too big to fail").

Lastly, as regards all other economic activities, it is understood that there is a general interest in preserving business which may be viable and which, circumstantially, find themselves in distress. Specifically, this general interest takes the form of maintaining employment and productivity and trying to avoid the inherent destruction of value inevitably entailed by almost all reassignments of means of production.

In line with this approach, the idea of preserving companies becomes one of the guiding principles of Insolvency Laws, with the huge difficulty involved in trying to reconcile this aim with the traditional objective of such Laws, which was primarily to satisfy creditors by levying collective and orderly execution against the debtor's assets.

Bearing in mind that the liquidation of assets in order to satisfy creditors' claims and the preservation of the company may be incompatible, the Spanish Insolvency Law has had to signpost which of the two aims or principles are to take precedence; accordingly, the Preamble to the Law clearly states that the satisfaction of creditors is the "essential aim of insolvency proceedings": in other words, where there is a conflict, the liquidation of the company takes priority over its preservation.

The priority chosen by our Law is not without its practical consequences. As statistics show, more than 95% of companies that go into formal insolvency are ultimately liquidated. Faced with this reality, the Spanish Insolvency Law is often accused of not being fit for purpose, namely, the company's preservation.

Where does the problem lie? The problem is twofold and stems, first, from the fact that an attempt is made to reconcile these two aims in the context of formal insolvency proceedings through an arrangement between the debtor and its creditors; this is recognised in the Preamble to the Law, which states that "even though the purpose of the insolvency proceeding is not to turn around enterprises, an arrangement for continuity may be the instrument for saving those considered fully or partially viable, to the benefit not only of the creditors but also of the insolvent enterprise itself, its employees and other interests." In doing so, the principle of preservation of companies is linked to the authority already held by creditors to decide whether to replace collective execution against the debtor's assets with an arrangement with the debtor that enables the business to continue and its future profits to be used to achieve a better level of debt satisfaction. Other aspects are added to reinforce this principle, including allowing the debtor to remain at the helm of its business until a vote is taken on the arrangement, keeping its contracts in force and unaffected by the formal insolvency proceeding and, as a last resort, where liquidation is unavoidable, encouraging the disposal of the business units as a whole concern, that is, attempting to avoid, as far as possible, the piecemeal break-up or isolated sell-off of its constituent parts.

Nevertheless, procedurally speaking, the arrangement with creditors is the last stage of the formal insolvency proceeding, usually reached by a company reeling already after a protracted court proceeding and with extremely scant possibility of salvation. Preserving a company should not be left to the last minute, by which point the impairment of the debtor's assets is so severe that the available solutions are all but non-existent, but rather insolvency should be tackled early on so as to resolve situations of distress in the initial stages, where the range of solutions available is infinitely greater.

In this respect, Spain's Insolvency Law hits the nail squarely on the head: by introducing into Spanish law the concept of "imminent technical insolvency," which is an unprecedented development in this country's legal tradition, and borrowed from German law. Imminent technical insolvency allows traders to tackle insolvency early on the basis of foresight, as stipulated in Article 2.3 of the Insolvency Law: "A debtor is deemed to be in a state of imminent technical insolvency where it foresees that it will be unable to meet its obligations in a regular and timely manner." Pursuant to this provision, foresight of technical insolvency may be linked to the earliest stages of financial distress, that is, the structural and non- circumstantial loss of profitability or the break-even point, since from that moment on it is foreseeable that losses (sooner or later, depending on the company's equity) will become pathological. Indeed, the reference to "timeliness" means that foresight may be linked to mere liquidity gaps.

However, while Spain's Insolvency Law successfully deals with what we could call the diagnosis, it fails miserably when it comes to the cure, by signaling formal insolvency proceedings at court as the sole means for resolving these preliminary stages of technical insolvency. A formal insolvency proceeding, given its origin and purpose, is a mechanism essentially geared towards satisfying creditors rather than preserving the company, and to do so it must be surrounded by disclosure, safeguards for creditors – in short, a judicialised approach – making it of little use for rescuing companies.

The preservation of companies is not easily reconcilable with the lengthy and costly court proceedings entailed by formal insolvency proceedings and perhaps we would be better served by leaving such proceedings to do what they were really designed to: liquidate the common debtor's assets in an orderly and collective manner in order to satisfy creditors' claims where the business is no longer viable.

That said, new concepts need to be introduced to facilitate the aim of turning around and saving companies from the earliest stages of technical insolvency. In short, it is a question of providing traders with a range of restructuring tools to help them tackle situations of financial distress in the pre-insolvency phase, when creditors' rights are not so seriously threatened and the principle of preserving the company can take precedence over the satisfaction of creditors' claims.

In Spain, there have been insistent calls for early solutions of this type since the onset of the current serious financial crisis, although it was only in late March 2009 that the Spanish lawmakers finally heeded such calls and began to timidly incorporate these solutions into the Insolvency Law. Refinancing as a pre- insolvency solution has gained widespread acceptance and has been shielded from the possibility of subsequent asset claw backs in formal proceedings where businesses are no longer viable, provided that certain causal and formal requirements are met.

Yet this timid reform remains far removed from an orderly and systematic body of law in step with other Spanish legislation in order to meet the needs of businesses in the 21st century in terms of insolvency prevention. A qualitative conceptual leap is required in order to realise that what companies need today and are demanding is, so to speak, a Business Restructuring Law: (i) guided by the principle of preserving companies, which can now be given precedence, since only pre-insolvency situations are involved in which there is not yet a threat of such proportions to creditors that it obliges the law to treat the satisfaction of their claims as a priority; (ii) which envisages an earlier event triggering the application of the law, such as the non-circumstantial loss of profitability or a gap in financing, placing effective restructuring tools at the disposal of traders, both on an operating and financial level, thereby allowing businesses to return to the parameters required to operate in the free market; and (iii) integrating, in short, court-driven insolvency proceedings as a residual, fall-back solution for companies whose viability cannot be salvaged through such business restructuring tools, thereby regaining its traditional and distinctive purpose of liquidation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions