On February 15, 2004, the Swiss Federal Council has released for comments the draft Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes ("CISA" or the "Act") meant to replace and supersede the Swiss Federal Act on Investment Funds ("IFA").1

The innovations brought by CISA consist in introducing New forms of "collective investment schemes", transposing the recent amendments made to the European directive on collective investment scheme (the "European Directive")2, and impose certain enhanced obligations in the Swiss investment fund industry.

1. New forms of "collective investment schemes" and need for an authorization;

CISA maintains an obligation to request an authorization from the supervisory authority both for the product, i.e. the collective investment scheme, and the services provider.

The IFA subjects to a prior authorisation only Swiss investment funds that are structured as a contract. With CISA, Swiss investment companies with variable capital (SICAV)3, Swiss investment companies with a fix capital (SICAF), Swiss limited partnerships for collective investments4 and Swiss investment foundations, shall all qualify as collective investment schemes subject to the Act. It shall be noted that only qualified investors5 may invest in Swiss limited partnerships for collective investments and SICAF that are not listed on a stock exchange while only pension funds can invest in Swiss investment foundations.

In this respect, companies conducting a commercial or industrial activity, holding companies, investment clubs (as long as their members can manage their funds) are expressly excluded from the scope of the Act. It shall be noted that CISA does not subject to any authorization "financial instruments structured like investment funds" (such as "index certificates", "structured notes", "index tracking stocks", etc.) issued by Swiss or foreign banks or securities dealers to the extent it is clearly indicated in the marketing material, in case of a public solicitation, that the instrument is not a collective investment scheme pursuant to CISA.

Foreign collective investment schemes fall under CISA, independently of their legal form, as soon as there is a public solicitation in or from Switzerland.

2. Transposition of amendments made to the European directives

The European Directive has been amended on December 4, 2001 under the heading "UCIT III" by two additional directives. CISA has also transposed most of these amendments.

a) Authorization of the manager of collective investment schemes

Under the Act, asset managers that are managing a Swiss collective investment scheme must be authorized by the Federal Banking Commission ("FBC") to the extent that they are not already subject to a state supervision. Even if the formalities and specific requirements of this authorization shall be defined in the implementing ordinance of the CISA, it is likely that they would be similar to those provided by the amended European Directive (i.e. capitalization requirements, guarantee of an irreproachable activity, qualification, education, etc...).

b) Fund management company

The activities of a fund management company shall not be restricted to the mere management of an investment fund as provided for under IFA. Thus, and more generally, thanks to CISA, a fund management company will be entitled to provide (i) general asset management activities, (ii) investment advisory activities, and (iii) custody and technical administration of collective investment schemes.

It shall also be noted that pursuant to the Act, a fund management company can only delegate investment decisions to an asset manager that is subject to an equivalent supervision. Furthermore, for securities funds, the delegation of investment decisions to the custodian (or to companies affiliated to the fund management company) will not be authorized.

c) Simplified prospectus

We shall point out that the most important innovation of the CISA, in light of the European Directive, is that a simplified prospectus shall be published for securities funds, "other funds" making traditional investments and real estate funds.

3. Enhanced obligations

CISA lays upon certain intermediaries active in the investment fund business additional duties that can be summarized as follow:

a) Duty to report

As already applicable to other financial intermediaries, such as banks, securities dealers6 and fund management companies7, the CISA introduces a duty to report for all the persons or products subject to an authorization; this duty to report must address all changes concerning (i) qualified participations with a threshold percentage similar to SESTA8, (ii) directors or managers, or (iii) by-laws, regulations or partnership agreements.

b) Rules of conduct

Article 12 IFA provides already for a duty of loyalty applicable to fund management companies. However, similarly to Article 11 SESTA, the Article 26 CISA introduces rules of conduct, namely a duty of loyalty, a duty of diligence and a duty of information, for all entities subject to an authorization as well as their agents.

Finally, it shall be noticed that CISA also embeds other rules of conduct contained already in the SFA rules of conduct for the Swiss fund industry.

c) Audit

With the exception of distributors of collective investment schemes, all the other persons or entities subject to an authorization must be audited by auditors that have been accredited by the supervisory authority, i.e. currently the FBC.

4. Tax considerations

The question of the taxation of collective investment schemes is, in fact, what has considerably delayed the release of CISA. In principle, collective investment schemes will be considered as transparent for income tax purposes. All services, including distribution efforts, provided to collective investment schemes will also be exempt from VAT in Switzerland.

The comments pertaining to the Act were due last month. The various Swiss financial associations (e.g. Swiss Funds Association, Swiss Banker Associations) all concur that it is necessary to replace IFA with a new Act. Furthermore, the bilateral treaties negotiated by Switzerland seem to go forward. Therefore, it is possible that CISA could be enacted by the end of the year 2005 already.

Footnotes

1. The text is available at http://www.ebk.admin.ch/f/aktuell/index.htm

2. The directive of the European Union 85/611/CEE (OPCVM/UCIT) of December 20, 1985.

3. The SICAV is a well known investment vehicle in the financial field since this type of vehicle exists in several states of the European Union, namely Luxembourg, and thus does not require any further presentation. We shall point out that the Act allows the sole persons holding founder's shares, as opposed to investors' shares, to dissolve the SICAV.

4. The features of this type of company can be summarized as follows: the corporate purpose must be the investment in risk capital, the company length shall not be longer than twelve years, the general partners can be legal entities and the limited partners shall exclusively be qualified investors.

5. CISA does not define the notion of qualified investor since it shall be the Federal Council who shall provide such definition in its implementing ordinance. However, it has been indicated that this notion shall be adapted to the notion of qualified investor included in the European Directive which includes, in addition to investors whose treasuries are managed in a professional manner, commercial and industrial companies, high net wealth individuals who hold securities in excess of € 500'000.-

6. See FBC circular 92/1

7. See article 13 IFO

8. Swiss stock exchange and securities trading Act of March 24, 1995.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.