British Virgin Islands: Submission To Jurisdiction And ‘Impracticability’ Of Service

Last Updated: 2 February 2015
Article by Jerry D. Samuel


The introduction of a gateway to obtain permission for an alternative method of service out of the jurisdiction under CPR Part 7.8A was one of the key amendments made to Part 7 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Civil Procedure Rules, 2000 (the "CPR") on 1 October 2011. Since enactment of that provision, there has been no reported decision about its precise effect and scope as part of the service out regime.

That position has now changed with a recent decision in Claim No. BVIHC (COM) 062 of 2014 between JSC VTB Bank -v- Alexander Katunin and Sergey Taruta, where the BVI Commercial Court shed some light on its view of that provision. In this Case, the Court considered, inter alia, whether an order for alternative service within the jurisdiction, made pursuant to CPR Part 7.8A against a proposed defendant who is outside the jurisdiction, was properly made. This was part of an interesting decision to determine whether the first Defendant submitted to the jurisdiction by conduct in the face of repeated reservations of his right to contest service and jurisdiction.

Relevant Facts

The non-exhaustive relevant factual background may be summarised as follows. In Claim No. BVIHC (COM) 062 of 2014 between JSC VTB Bank -v- Alexander Katunin and Sergey Taruta the Claimant ("VTB") is a Russian Bank seeking common law enforcement against the Defendants in the BVI, in respect of a judgment obtained from the Meschansky District Court in Russia (the "District Court") in the sum of US$30 million. The Defendants, K and T, are said to have BVI assets by way of shares in BVI companies.

An application made by the first Defendant ("K") and dealt with by the BVI Court sought to set aside an alternative service order. That application arose in circumstances where VTB obtained permission to serve K outside the jurisdiction in the Russian Federation, then subsequently obtained an order for alternative service (the "Alternate Service Order") on K under CPR Part 7.8A. The Alternative Service Order permitted VTB to leave the claim form and other documents with the registered agents of the BVI companies beneficially owned by K.

K filed an acknowledgment of service in August 2014, and therein provided VTB with notice that this was done without prejudice to his right to challenge service and jurisdiction. On the same day, VTB filed an application for summary judgment. In response, in September 2014 K wrote to VTB's lawyers to agree to an extension of time to serve a defence, until after the summary judgment application. That letter continued to reserve all of K's rights to challenge service and jurisdiction. Failing agreement between the parties, K applied for an extension of time to serve a defence until after determination of the summary judgment application.

In opposition to the summary judgment application, in October 2014 K filed an application for permission to adduce expert evidence of Russian law, along with an affidavit, inter alia, expressly opposing summary judgment. In November 2014, K's application for an extension of time was heard, but on the same day of that application, K filed a jurisdictional challenge and abandoned the extension application incurring liability for costs.

Reservations and Submission to Jurisdiction

The Court considered the well-known proposition in Williams & Glynn's Bank Plc -v- Astro Dinamico Cia Naviera SA [1984] 1 All ER 760 that generally, a foreign defendant will not be prejudiced if he makes it clear that he is objecting to the Court's jurisdiction by making applications that are not inconsistent with those objections.

On the facts, even though the affidavit filed on behalf of K in opposition to the summary judgment application (and indeed every application filed on his behalf) contained reservations to challenge service and jurisdiction, the BVI Court found that the affidavit fully argued the merits of K's defence to VTB's claim and sought decisions in K's favour on the merits of the substantive claim.

The BVI Court also held that the application to adduce expert evidence of Russian law in opposition to the summary judgment application and K's application for an extension of time to serve his defence were similarly inconsistent with any contention that the Court was without jurisdiction over K.

In the final analysis, which speaks for itself, the BVI Court opined as follows:

"In my judgment a reservation of rights, however consistently repeated, cannot trump conduct which of itself renders continued assertion of those rights futile. The question whether a person has submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court is a question of fact - using 'fact' as a way to describe a particular state of affairs, rather than in contradistinction to a question of law. It is idle for a person filing a document which effects a submission to the jurisdiction to set up expressions in the very document as neutralising the plain legal effect of the step taken – just as a man cannot walk through a door while reserving the right not to have done so."

Following the analysis above, the Court concluded that by asking for dismissal of VTB's summary judgment application and seeking permission to adduce expert evidence in its efforts to persuade the Court to do so, K engaged with VTB within the jurisdiction on the substantial merits of the claim and must be taken to have waived or abandoned whatever right he may earlier have had to challenge the Court's jurisdiction. On that basis, the application to set aside service was dismissed.

The Court's view of CPR Part 7.8A

Although the above finding was sufficient to dispose of K's application, the Court helpfully went on to consider K's objections in relation to service within the jurisdiction under CPR Part 7.8A(1), which provides as follows:

"Where service under Rule 7.8 is impracticable, the claimant may apply for an order under this Rule that the claim form may be served by a method specified by this Court."

In considering whether the Alternative Service Order should be set aside, it was not disputed that service under the Hague Convention applied between the BVI and the Russian Federation in relation to service on K in the Russian Federation, but this process was not engaged by VTB.

In contending that the Alternative Service Order should be set aside, it was argued that the threshold for permitting alternative service under the CPR upon a proposed Defendant who is out of the jurisdiction is that service must be 'impracticable' under CPR Part 7.8. It was further argued that the Court could not have been satisfied that service was 'impracticable' because VTB did not even attempt to serve through the Hague Convention. Finally, the contention was made that alternative service within the jurisdiction cannot be ordered under CPR Part 7.8A, against a proposed Defendant who is outside the jurisdiction. Consequently, K should be treated as having never been served.

In dismissing these points, the Court observed and opined that there was no express restriction under CPR Part 7.8A to the effect that alternative service within the jurisdiction cannot be ordered against a proposed Defendant who is outside the jurisdiction and concluded that there is no reason to imply any such restriction. In distinguishing Deutsche Bank AG -v- Sebastian Holdings Inc. [2014] 4 All ER (comm) 733, which was relied on by K, the Court held that the nature of the procedure said to be adopted by the Russian authorities in this case was not present in the Deutsche Bank Case.

Specifically, in the present case, the Court found that the overall thrust of the expert evidence of Russian law was that an intended Defendant who is in Russia cannot be compelled to accept service of foreign process. The BVI Court considered this expert evidence and the principal evidence of fact that K failed to attend the hearing before the District Court at which the judgment was obtained and concluded that this was sufficient evidence to enable it to decide that it was more probable than not, that K would not submit to service under the Hague Convention in Russia and accordingly, it was 'impracticable' to serve him by that route. As a result, the BVI Court concluded that the Alternative Service Order was properly made.


In many ways, the decision in Claim No. BVIHC (COM) 062 of 2014 between JSC VTB Bank -v- Alexander Katunin and Sergey Taruta best reflects the pragmatism of the BVI Commercial Court and the important role that conduct of a Litigant can play in high value, multi-jurisdictional commercial disputes. In relation to submission to jurisdiction, the BVI Commercial Court has signaled that in cases of ambiguity, conduct trumps words and substance triumphs over form. Practitioners and Litigants would be well advised to tread carefully in order to avoid procedural pitfalls when seeking to reserve the right to challenge service and jurisdiction.

The Court's signal of its interpretation of CPR Part 7.8A is useful, because it suggests that where the express provisions of the CPR are clear the Commercial Court will be reluctant to import or imply unnecessary restrictions. Moreover, while the threshold for 'impracticability' can be illusive, the approach of the Commercial Court confirms that for enforcement actions, the conduct of the debtor before the foreign court may be highly relevant, along with important nuances of foreign procedural law.

If this decision is appealed, it will be equally interesting to see whether the Court of Appeal adopts the same approach and whether any further guidance will be forthcoming in relation to the scope of CPR Part 7.8A.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions