Chile: Overview Of Competition Law In Chile

Last Updated: 3 June 2016
Article by Claudio Lizana and Fabián Piedra

Co-authored by Jaime Barahona Urzúa and Tomás Kubick Orrego from Guerrero Olivos


a. Applicable law and regulations

Decree Law no. 211 of 1973 and its subsequent amendments ("DL 211") establish the main legal framework for antitrust matters in Chile.

Additionally, there are several other –more or less relevant in terms of competition laws and regulations– DL 211-related regulations, such as Law no. 20,169 of 2007 (unfair competition), DFL no. 323 of 1931 (gas services), DFL no. 1,122 of 1981(water code), Law no. 18,168 of 1982 (telecommunications), DFL no. 70 of 1988 and DFL no. 382 of 1989 (both sanitary services), Law no. 18,840 of 1989 (Chilean Central Bank), Law no. 19,039 of 1991 (industrial property), Law no. 19,342 of 1994 (new plant variety protection), DS no. 900 of 1996 (public works concessions), Law no. 19,496 of (consumer protection), Law no. 19,518 of 1997 (training and employment), Law no. 19,542 of 1997 and DS no. 104 of 1998 (both state port sector), Law no. 19,545 of 1998 (exports), Law no. 19,733 of 2011 (freedom of opinion), DLF no. 1 of 2003 (labor code) and DLF no. 4 of 2007 (electrical services).

b. Theories of harm present in the law

Article 3 of DL 211 states, generically, that whoever carries out or enters into, individually or collectively, any conduct, act or agreement that "impedes, restricts or hinders free competition or that tends to produce such effects", will be sanctioned with the measures contemplated therein.

In that sense, any conduct with horizontal or vertical effects, both unilateral and coordinated, that lessen free competition may be sanctioned. There is no definition of free competition in DL 211.

c. Authority in charge of enforcement of antitrust law and regulations

The Antitrust Court (Tribunal de Defensa de la Libre Competencia, "TDLC") and the National Economic Prosecutor's Office (Fiscalía Nacional Económica, "FNE") are responsible for enforcing Chilean antitrust laws within their own scope of authorities.

On one hand, the TDLC is a special and independent court of law, composed of 3 lawyers and 2 economists, and subject to the supervision of the Supreme Court. Its role is to prevent, correct and sanction anti-competitive conducts, to decide all cases the FNE or private persons may submit to its consideration. The TDLC is also in charge of issuing general guidelines for the enforcement of competition law.

On the other, the FNE is an independent administrative entity in charge of investigating conducts that may constitute antitrust infringements, representing the public interest before the TDLC and seeking enforcement of resolutions, decisions and instructions issued and passed by such Court.

d. Nature of antitrust enforcement

Chilean antitrust enforcement has a hybrid nature. In terms of the nature of the Prosecutor (i.e. the FNE) and of the sanctions we could say that Chilean antitrust enforcement is administrative. However, it is worth noticing that the sanctions are subject to the decision of a court of law (i.e. the TDLC and eventually the Supreme Court).

Since the amendment of 2003, which created the TDLC, criminal sanctions were eliminated to focus on administrative ones. They include:

  1. the modification or termination of the acts or agreements against free competition;
  2. order the modification or dissolution of the companies involved in the violations;
  3. fines up to approximately USD 15 million or USD 22 million in cartel cases; and
  4. other preventive, corrective or prohibitive measures the TDLC may find relevant.

However, after the pharmacies case initiated in 2008, the Criminal Prosecutor opened a criminal investigation arguing that cartel behaviour affecting prices may qualify as a criminal offence as well pursuant to Article 285 of the Criminal Code, which contemplated imprisonment from 61 days to three years for "fraudulent natural price adulteration". Nevertheless, in December, 2015 the Court of Appeals upheld the Criminal Court's ruling that acquitted the accused executives, weakening this criminal enforcement attempt. In this regard, one of the most important topics of the currently ongoing antitrust bill of law (Bulletin no. 9950-03, the "Bill") is the establishment of hardcore cartels as a criminal offense. The conduct would be punishable by imprisonment between 5 years and one day and 10 years.

Finally, there is also a civil scope in the antitrust enforcement (see letter l.).

e. Investigational powers of authority

The FNE may request collaboration and information necessary to its investigation from any officer of public services or entities, municipalities, and the companies in which the government –and its companies, entities or municipalities– have representation or participation. In addition, the FNE may request private persons and companies –investigated or third parties– to provide any information and records that it may consider necessary for the ongoing investigation. However, individuals and representatives of legal entities from whom the FNE requests information that may damage their own interests may request the TDLC to annul or amend such request. The FNE may also summon private persons –investigated or third parties– to intervene.

Finally, the 2009 amendment of the DL 211 granted new powers to the FNE in order to strengthen anti cartel enforcement. Pursuant to article 39 (n), the FNE assisted by the police may:

  1. access to private or public premises and, if necessary, unlock or break in;
  2. register and seize any kind of objects or documents that may be useful to prove the existence of an infringement;
  3. intercept any kind of communications; and
  4. order to any company that renders communication services to give access to copies or registers of transmitted or received communications. Such measures shall be authorized by a Judge from the Court of Appeals, based on a well-founded request pre-approved by the TDLC. The authorization, only to be given in serious and qualified cases in regard to cartel investigations, shall precisely mention the measures allowed, the term and the individuals that may be affected.

f. Attorney-client privilege

Pursuant to Article 220 of the Criminal Procedure Code, applicable to DL 211, the following information, which could be considered as "privileged", cannot be seized:

  1. communications between the accused and individuals that are not obliged to declare as witnesses, considering its family relationship or their duty of secrecy (e.g. external legal counsels);
  2. notes taken by the people previously mentioned in relation to said communications; and
  3. any other objects or documents to which the non-declaration faculty naturally extends to.

Such Article states that the prohibition shall rule only in regard to the communications, notes, objects and/or documents that are under the control of the individuals that are entitled to this non-declaration guaranty (i.e. the attorney). A contrario sensu, when said information is under the control of the client, although arguably, we believe it could be taken away since the client, as such, does not have such non-declaration guaranty. Nevertheless, the affected party would be able to request such evidence not be used in trial. We acknowledge that the law is not clear on this respect and this matter may be subject to debate in the future.

In addition, both the Criminal Procedure Code and DL 211 state that communications between the investigated party and its attorney cannot be wire tapped.

g. Interactions with other regulators

As stated in letter e., the FNE may ask for collaboration and information necessary to its investigation from any officer of public services or entities. In such case, the officers are obliged to comply with the request.

The FNE may also enter into agreements with public bodies for mutual collaboration and in order to agree on electronic transfer of information. In this regard, the FNE has signed with the National Consumer Service (SERNAC), the Criminal Prosecutor, the General Comptroller Office, the Ministry of Public Works, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Department of Public Procurement (ChileCompra), the National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), the Administrative Corporation of the Judicial Power (CAPJ), the Internal Revenue Service (SII), the Production Development Corporation (CORFO), the National Commission of Energy (CNE) and the National Public Health Procurement Office (CENABAST).

h. Treaties in place

Several treaties signed by Chile contain antitrust provisions. For instance, Free Trade Agreements with Canada, Central America (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Guatemala), the United States of America, Mexico, Peru, EFTA (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland), Republic of Korea and Australia; the Economic Complementation Agreement with Mercosur (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay); the Economic Partnership Agreements with the European Union and Japan; and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement P4 with New Zealand, Brunei and Singapore.

i. Standards of evidence

DL 211 provides a rather open frame in regard to the admissible evidence and its assessment by the TDLC. Apart from the ones applicable to civil procedures –documents, parties and third parties depositions, court's own inspection and assumptions– shall be admissible "all evidence or information which is, as per the TDLC, suitable to establish the relevant facts". The TDLC may also, at any time and when essential to clarify still obscure facts, decree evidentiary procedures it deems convenient. The TDLC shall assess the evidence according to the rules of "reasoned opinion" ("sana crítica").

Notwithstanding the above, the standard of evidence is not established in the DL 211. However, there would be a common understanding that the antitrust standard should be situated in between the "preponderance of the evidence" (civil matters) and "beyond all reasonable doubt" (criminal matters) standards. To which one is closer have changed depending on the unlawful conduct, the origin of the ruling (issued by the TDLC or the Supreme Court) and the year it was issued. Nowadays, taking into account the difficulty to gather direct evidence (even with the FNE's intrusive investigative powers), the standard tends to be more flexible.

j. Methods of engagement with authority

DL 211 procedures impose a formal engagement through briefs which become part of the public record of the procedure.

On the contrary, the investigation procedures before the FNE tend to be flexible (more or less, depending on the kind of investigation and the quality of the party). Although formal engagements are the main ones –offices and request of meetings and depositions– phone calls or emails would be permitted if necessary.

k. Judicial review of decisions

The TDLC's final judgment is subject to a remedy of complaint before the Supreme Court. Such remedy has to be well-founded and may be filed by any of the parties before the TDLC, within 10 days of the respective service.

The filing of the remedy does not suspend the enforcement of the judgment issued by the TDLC except for payment of the fines. However, at the request of a party, and upon a well-founded resolution, the Supreme Court may suspend the effects of the judgment in whole or in part.

l. Private litigation

Along with the FNE, privates are also entitled to directly file a claim before the TDLC. However, contrary to the FNE, which represents the "general interest of the collective economic order", the TDLC has stated that a private party requires being an "immediate passive subject" of a conduct that may violate DL 211 in order to file a claim. Furthermore, the TDLC has understood that for an agent to be considered as a direct victim of a free competition violation, it must currently or potentially participate in the market which is directly affected by the alleged anticompetitive activity or in other related markets that can reasonably be indirectly affected by the alleged unlawful activity.

Currently, private actions for civil damages caused by cartels may also be brought before the competent civil court in a summary proceeding once the TDLC has declared the existence of antitrust violation and has imposed sanctions. The only subject that may be analyzed after an administrative cartel decision is if there is a direct relation (cause-effect) between the antitrust infringement and the damage. Also, the amount and nature of the damages require to be proved.

To read this Overview in full, please click here.

Originally published by IBRAC – Brazilian Institute of Studies on Competition, Consumer Affairs and International Trade

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions