Qatar: Burning The Boiler Plate - Drafting An Effective Arbitration Clause

Last Updated: 26 October 2016
Article by Richard Bell

John is an in house counsel for a large Chinese company working on a cross border transaction with a Qatari company.  It is 11:30pm on a Thursday night and John has to prepare the final draft of the contract for the Managing Director who is due to sign it with the counter party in Doha the following day.
John gets to the dispute resolution clause at the end of the contract which provides for disputes to be referred to the Qatari Courts.  John is not quite comfortable with this and decides arbitration would be better.    Short on time, John uses a "boiler plate" arbitration clause the company has used in previous contracts in Qatar which simply provides for disputes to be referred to "arbitration in Doha".

Sound familiar?

While it is tempting to use a boiler plate arbitration clause, when it comes to arbitration, that can be a dangerous practice.  In the example cited above, if a dispute arose between the parties, the boiler plate clause would mean the dispute would have to be referred to ad hoc arbitration in Doha administered by the Qatari Courts.  This will potentially give rise to all sorts of issues over the enforceability of the clause, the procedural rules to be adopted for the arbitration and the enforceability of the award itself.   Issues might also arise in arranging visas for counsel, witnesses and the tribunal members, not to mention the cost flying all of these people to Doha.

In this article, we look at the elements of an arbitration clause, what factors should be considered when drafting an arbitration clause and give five "top tips" on how to draft an effective clause.

Components of an arbitration clause

In order to draft an effective arbitration clause, it is important to have an understanding of the following concepts:

1. Institutional and ad hoc arbitration

There are two types of arbitration the parties can choose from to resolve any disputes under their contract – institutional or ad hoc.  Institutional arbitration is simply an arbitration that is administered by a recognized arbitral institution such as International Commercial Court (ICC), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC).   These institutions have their own rules and are responsible for arranging the appointment of the arbitral tribunal and the administration of the arbitration.

Ad hoc arbitration refers to arbitration that is not administered by an institution and requires the parties to make their own arrangements for the selection of the arbitral tribunal.

2. Arbitral tribunal

In most arbitrations, the arbitral tribunal will comprise of either one or three arbitrators.  Where the parties have agreed on institutional arbitration, the rules of the institution will usually contain default provisions governing the number of arbitrators in the event the parties have not covered this in the contract and cannot agree.

3. Procedural rules

Most arbitral institutions issue rules governing the appointment of the tribunal and the procedure for the arbitration.  In many cases the procedural rules will give the tribunal a wide discretion to determine the manner and timing of the various procedural steps in the arbitration such as the filing of pleadings, the exchange of documents and witness evidence and the scheduling of hearings.

In an ad hoc arbitration, it is up to the parties to agree on the procedural rules that will apply.  In such cases, the parties can agree to make their own rules, or adopt internationally recognized rules such as the UNCITRAL Rules.

4. Venue

The venue of the arbitration is the physical location where the arbitration hearing will take place.

5. Seat

Out of all the components of an arbitration clause, the seat is the one that always causes the most confusion.  Put simply, the seat of an arbitration is the "legal place" of the arbitration.  The seat is important because it will determine:

  1. The procedural law governing the arbitration.    In some jurisdictions, there are arbitration laws that contain mandatory provisions dealing with such matters as the removal of arbitrators, the general duties of the tribunal and the parties, enforcement of an award or a challenge to an award on the basis of lack of substantive jurisdiction or serious irregularity.  In other jurisidictions, there may be no such laws or the laws will be very basic;
  2. Which court has supervision over the arbitration.  If a procedural issue arises during the course of the arbitration that cannot be determined by the tribunal - for example if an arbitrator has to be replaced because of death, injury or a conflict of interest or if the Tribunal has committed a gross procedural error - the seat determines which Court will resolve that issue;
  3. The "nationality" of the award.

To give an example, if the seat of an arbitration is Shanghai, then Chinese law will be the procedural law of the arbitration, the Shanghai Courts will have supervision over the arbitration and the award will be a Chinese award for the purposes of enforcement.

While the seat and the venue of an arbitration will often be in the same country, this is not always the case and is not a mandatory requirement. For example, it is perfectly acceptable to have, say Hong Kong as the venue of the arbitration and Singapore as the seat. This means that hearings will be held in Hong Kong, Singaporean law will be the procedural law of the arbitration, the Singapore Courts will have supervision over the arbitration and the award will be a Singaporean award for the purposes of enforcement.

6. Language

The language of the arbitration covers all aspects of the proceeding including the parties' pleadings, the presentation of documentary and oral evidence and the award itself.   This is important, particularly where the parties do not share a common language.  If, for example, a Chinese company enters into a contract with a UK company and the language of the arbitration is English, all pleadings will need to be in English, any documents that are in Chinese will need to be translated into English and any Chinese witnesses who do not speak English will need to have a translator at the hearing.

Drafting an effective clause

In drafting an arbitration clause, it can be difficult to decide where to be begin.  How do all the elements described above fit together?  In our experience, the crucial issues to consider are:

1. Enforceability

The first question to ask when drafting an arbitration clause is: – do I want certainty that the arbitration award will be enforced?  If the answer to that question is yes, then you need a clause that will  give you the most direct route to enforcement.   That in turn will depend on where the other party's assets are located.  If the other party has assets in several jurisdictions, then it is a good idea to have the seat of the arbitration in a neutral jurisdiction that is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention").  As there are 156 signatories to the New Yok Convention, having the seat in a neutral jurisdiction which is itself a signatory will ensure maximum flexibility when it comes to enforcement.  For example, a Chinese company entering into a contract with a UK company that has assets in the UK, Malaysia and Australia might want to choose Hong Kong or Singapore as the seat of the arbitration as this will mean the award will be able to be enforced in each of those three jurisdictions as a foreign award under the New York Convention.

Where the counter party only has assets in one jurisdiction, then one has to look more closely at the jurisdiction.  Some jurisdictions such as Vietnam, Saudi Arabia and, to a certain extent China, have an uneven track record in enforcing foreign awards.  In these jurisdictions, the chances of enforcement may be improved by having a local seat and referring the dispute to arbitration before a domestic arbitration center which will be more familiar to the enforcing Court.  In some cases, it may even be better to dispense with arbitration entirely and simply refer disputes to the local Courts if that is the most direct route to enforcement.  In many middle eastern jurisdictions for example, arbitral awards have to be ratified by the Courts before they can be enforced.  This ratification process can take many months, sometimes years, before the award will be finally recognized and enforced, if at all.  If the counter party only has assets in that jurisdiction, the better course may be to go straight to court rather than go to the expense of arbitration and face the risk of a lengthy ratification battle.

2. Cost

Cost is an important factor when drafting an arbitration clause.  Arbitration is an expensive form of dispute resolution (often more expensive than litigation) and if an arbitration clause is not drafted correctly, costs can increase significantly.  In our experience, costs can be minimized in the following ways:

  • Opting for institutional rather than ad hoc arbitration;
  • Choosing an arbitral institution with a good track record of for efficient management of claims and the appointment of competent tribunals;
  • Choosing an arbitration friendly seat – This will ensure your arbitration will be supervised by a competent court supported by a body of tried and tested arbitration law;
  • Opting for one arbitrator instead of three – It is often the case that the parties to a contract will want to have a tribunal of three arbitrators to minimize the risk of a "rogue" or biased arbitrator.  However, if the contract is relatively straightforward and/or low value, then one arbitrator is probably sufficient.  If the arbitration clause provides for institutional arbitration before a reputable arbitration center, then the risk of an unsuitable arbitrator being appointed should be low;
  • Choosing a convenient venue – The cost of flying counsel, witnesses and the tribunal members to the arbitration venue for the hearing and their accommodation costs can add up to a significant sum.  When selecting the venue for the arbitration therefore, it is good practice to choose a city which will not be too difficult or expensive to get to and will not have any unusual visa restrictions;
  • Choosing a common language for the arbitration – When selecting the language of the arbitration, it is good practice to choose a language that will keep translation costs to a minimum.

3. Procedural fairness

One of the key benefits of arbitration is that it provides for an alternative form of dispute resolution where there are concerns over the expertise and neutrality of the local Courts.   However, referring disputes to arbitration is not an absolute guarantee that the tribunal will be either competent or neutral.    When in doubt, the safest course is to choose institutional arbitration over ad hoc arbitration and select an institution with a good reputation for appointing experienced and impartial tribunals.

Other points to consider

  • Costs

Some arbitral institutions will have default provisions in their rules which will give the tribunal the power to award legal costs to the successful party.  Others do not.  If you want the right to claim legal costs in an arbitration, check whether the rules cover this.  If they don't, it is best to include the right to claim costs in the arbitration clause itself.  Don't rely on the tribunal assuming it has this power.

  • Stepped arbitration clauses

Stepped arbitration clauses, which provide for "amicable negotiations" and/or mediation before a dispute is referred to arbitration, are quite popular these days.  However, they can cause problems if they are loosely drafted with no clear deadlines or procedures for the settlement discussions.  A respondent party intent on dragging the dispute resolution process out can often exploit a poorly drafted clause to buy more time.  If you want to refer a dispute to arbitration as quickly as possible, these types of clauses are best avoided.  If you want to commence settlement discussions with the other party, you can do that at any time.   You don't need a clause in your contract to negotiate.

  • Governing law

When drafting an arbitration clause, it is important to distinguish between the rules of the arbitration and the governing law .  The rules of the arbitration relate to the procedural aspects of the arbitration such as the appointment of the tribunal, the exchange of pleadings and evidence and the issuing of the award.  The governing law is the substantive law that is to be applied to determine the underlying legal issues in dispute.    Many general counsel consider the governing law clause to be of primary importance in a contract.  While the governing law is certainly important, in our view, it is more important to ensure that you have an arbitration clause that is enforceable and provides for an efficient and fairly administered arbitration.  If you have to compromise with your counter party over the terms of a dispute resolution clause, in many cases it will be better to compromise on the governing law than, say, the forum and seat of the arbitration.

Top tips

Drafting an arbitration clause can be tricky and getting it wrong can cost your company time and money.  We have seen many cases where a badly drafted clause has resulted in arbitrations being carried out in hostile jurisdictions or has led to the clause being declared unenforceable or the award invalid.   Against that background, here are our 5 top tips for drafting an effective arbitration clause:

  1. When in doubt, go for institutional rather than ad hoc arbitration and choose an institution with a good track record for efficient administration and the appointment of competent tribunals;
  2. Don't reinvent the wheel.  If you elect institutional arbitration, use the arbitration clause recommended by the institution.  Most of the more well known arbitration centers will have recommended clauses you can insert in your contract which can be modified easily to change the seat, venue, language or number of arbitrators;
  3. Keep it simple.  Don't try and use hybrid clauses where you have arbitration for some disputes, but reserve the right to revert to litigation for others.  Complex clauses lead to uncertainty which lead to disputes which result in delay and additional costs to the parties;
  4. Choose a convenient venue.  This doesn't have to be the same place as the seat although it does help to have the seat and venue in the same place;
  5. Remember – an arbitral award is worth nothing if it can't be enforced.  When choosing a seat, select one that will give you the maximum chance of enforcement against the other parties assets wherever they may be. 

If you are not sure whether the arbitration clause is appropriate, ask an experienced arbitration counsel for a second opinion.  Given the potentially costly consequences of a badly drafted clause, it is far better to be safe than sorry.

Burning The Boiler Plate - Drafting An Effective Arbitration Clause

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions