Worldwide: Insolvency Set-Off In The Reinsurance Context In Different Jurisdictions

Last Updated: 25 June 2018
Article by Virginia Martínez

In the reinsurance context, a usual query that arises in almost any single reinsurance transaction or contract where some money is advanced or handed over between the parties is whether it is possible to set-off mutual debts within an insolvency proceeding.

Set-off is an equitable right that allows the parties to a contract to cancel or offset mutual debts to each other by asserting the amounts owed, subtracting one from the other and paying only the balance.

The interest of the parties to set-off amounts arises, for example, in VIF (Value in Force) transactions, which imply monetizing the value in force of an insurer's individual life risk portfolio to allow such insurer to exchange the expectation of future cashflows for an upfront amount of capital. These VIF transactions, quite frequent in Europe in the last years, are structured through a reinsurance treaty whereby the cedant cedes the defined book to the reinsurer in exchange of an upfront reinsurance commission reflecting the assessment of the future profits expected to arise from such defined book of business. At the signing date of a VIF, the reinsurer shall pay a (usually) very high reinsurance commission, whereas the cedant pays an initial premium.

The right of set-off is particularly relevant in those cases where the cedant transfers the reserves to the reinsurer to enable the reinsurer to pay the reinsured claims. In these cases, the reinsurer is usually interested in being able to offset the reserves against amounts due by the cedant, especially in case of insolvency of the cedant.

This same problem arises in those cases where a reinsurance treaty provides for a premium withheld account, whereby the insurer withholds the periodic premiums collected from the policyholders up to the end of the period foreseen in the reinsurance contract in order to guarantee the fulfilment of the reinsurer's obligations. In such case, it is the cedant who needs to be entitled to offset the infringements of the reinsurer (unpaid reinsured claims) with the funds withheld.

The possibility for the parties to a reinsurance contract to offset mutual debts when one of the parties is insolvent is dealt with differently in the different European jurisdictions. Please find a brief description of the situation in Spain, the United Kingdom, France and Italy.


The possibility of offsetting payments is expressly regulated under articles 1195 to 1202 of the Spanish Civil Code. According to these articles, set-off is permitted when two persons or entities are reciprocally creditors and debtors of each other, provided that the following requirements (set out under Article 1196 of the Civil Code) are met:

  1. Each of the persons is a creditor of the other.
  2. Both debts consist of a sum of money or, when things owed are fungible, that they are of the same kind and also of the same quality, if the quality has been designated.
  3. Both debts must have matured.
  4. They are liquidated and enforceable.
  5. None of them is subject to any retention or dispute brought by a third party and of which due notice has been given to the debtor.

In light of the aforesaid, as a general rule set-off is permitted under Spanish law, provided that certain requirements are met.

However, the problem arises when one of the parties to the contract becomes insolvent. Under the Spanish Insolvency Act, the general rule is that it is not possible to set-off obligations once the insolvency of a contractual party is declared, unless the requirements for the set-off established under Article 1196 of the Civil Code are complied with before the insolvency proceedings are declared open.

Nevertheless, a large number of Scholars consider that the prohibition established under article 58 of the Insolvency Act does not apply when the credits and debts to be offset have the same origin or cause (''ex eadem causa''). That is, when the credits and debts derive from the same contract which foresees such set-off. According to this interpretation, the set-off that is carried out in those cases is not the general legal set-off of credits and debts of the insolvent company due to the whole number of contracts in which it is a party (situation to which article 58 of the Insolvency Act refers, according to the aforesaid Scholars) but instead, the set-off is the way of performance of the contract agreed by the parties.

The Supreme Court has also given some light on this issue very recently. In its Ruling of 13 March 2017 it says:

"Actually, we are not before a compensation per se (...). We find ourselves before a liquidation scenario of one single contractual relationship where obligations have arisen for both parties involved. In the rulings 188/2014, of 15 April, and 428/2014 of 24 July we have considered that in scenarios like this one, even in the case where the loans arise amongst a bankruptcy procedure, we are before a contract liquidation mechanism and not before compensations where Section 58 of the Bankruptcy Act is applicable".

This position of the Supreme Court has been held by the Barcelona High Court of Appeal in several judgments (for instance, rulings of 9 October 2014, 26 March 2014 and 6 March 2014), where it is expressly concluded that the setoff of mutual debts arising from the same contract shall be permitted upon the insolvency of one of the parties to such contract.

However, other courts (for example, the Madrid High Court of Appeal –judgment of 8 July 2008-) and other Scholars defend the opposite interpretation: insolvency set-off is only permitted if the requirements established under article 1196 of the Civil Code are met, regardless of whether the debts to be offset derive from the same title or contract. According to the High Court of Madrid, if the possibility to set-off is extended, the principle ''par condition creditorum'' (equal treatment of creditors) would be infringed. In addition, the Scholars who defend this position (a minority) understand that if the legislator had intended to exclude from the set-off prohibition credits ''ex eadem causa'', he would have expressly stated in article 58 of the Insolvency Act.


Unlike in Spain, the situation under French law is clearer. Pursuant to Article L. 622-7 of the French Commercial Code, the debtor is prohibited from paying debts incurred prior to the commencement of the proceedings, subject to specified exceptions.

The set-off of connected debts (''dettes connexes'') is actually one of these exclusions.

Debts are considered as connected when the credits and debts derive from the same contract, or from different contracts but within the same operation (same "ensemble contractuel"). Since the mutual debts to be offset in the context of a reinsurance transaction would derive from the same contract or operation, the parties would be allowed to set-off such mutual debts. In order to be able to set-off their claims, the creditors must file a proof of claim first. It is an efficient mechanism which is used quite often and allows a payment of the creditor outside the restructuring plan and without being in competition with the other creditors.

United Kingdom

Under English law, the position is also more straightforward than that under Spanish law.

The key authorities regarding insolvency set-off are Rule 14.24 (in respect of administration) and Rule 14.25 (in respect of liquidation) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (SI 2016/1024). In a liquidation, insolvency set-off applies where, "before the company goes into liquidation, there have been mutual dealings between the company and a creditor of the company... and the sums due from the one must be set off against the sums due from the other". In the case of an administration, insolvency set-off only applies where the administrator has delivered notice of an intended distribution to creditors - apart from this, it also applies to mutual dealings between parties in a similar way as in liquidation.

As the name suggests, "mutual dealings" must be "mutual". The meaning of this has developed through case law, but in brief, the parties' relationship to each other is key - the dealings must be between the same parties, acting in the same capacity, right or interest in respect of the various debts being claimed, although the debts do not need to arise from the same transaction. Therefore, if the debts are jointly owned with another party, arise by way of assignment or attachment by a creditor, or are subject to a security interest, they may not be "mutual" and so would not be subject to set-off.

Further, "mutual dealings" between two companies do not include any debts incurred or acquired where the noninsolvent party was in any way aware of the company's pending or current insolvency. For example, this includes (amongst other things) where a debt was incurred after the company went into administration or liquidation.

Subject to the above restrictions, the sums which must be set-off include broad types of amounts. It is irrelevant whether the amounts in issue are certain or less so, and the sums which must be set-off include (i) both future and presently payable sums; (ii) sums payable under either a certain or a contingent obligation; or (iii) "fixed or liquidated" amounts, or amounts which can be ascertained by either fixed rules or those which are a matter of opinion.

Where a sum is uncertain (because it is contingent or otherwise), it is up to the liquidator or administrator to estimate the value and inform the creditor of this value. In the case of any future debts (i.e. sums payable by either party after the date of the declaration of the dividend that an administrator or liquidator pays to creditors) which are being balanced as part of the insolvency set-off, they must be discounted under Rule 14.44 of the Insolvency Rules, which provides a formula to calculate the value of such future debts.

Lastly, insolvency set-off in liquidation is in theory an automatic process, which applies at the date on which the liquidation commences, with assets being treated as realised and distributed on that date (although, in practice, it will be a longer process for any set-off to be calculated and then for the liquidators to either collect or pay the outstanding relevant balance). In contrast, an administration is not an automatic process: insolvency set-off only applies from the date that the administrator has delivered notice of an intended distribution to creditors.


Finally, Italian law does not contemplate specific provisions as far as set-off in relation to reinsurance operations.

The general rule on set-off established by the Italian Civil Code allows the automatic set-off of mutual debts existing between two parties to the extent that such debts are enforceable, certain and due at the time of set-off. Even in the absence such legal requirements, mutual debtors may contractually agree to set-off their debts and the conditions thereof.

The situation is slightly different in an insolvency scenario. As a general principle, according to Article 56(1) of the Italian Insolvency Act - which also applies to compulsory administrative liquidation and extraordinary administration proceedings to which insurance and reinsurance companies may be subject - creditors of a bankrupt company are entitled to set-off their receivables with their debts vis-à-vis such company, even if not yet due.

However, pursuant to Article 56(2) of the Italian Insolvency Act, with reference to those receivables that were not yet due at the time of the opening of the insolvency proceedings, set-off is not allowed if the claims vis-à-vis the insolvent entity were purchased after the opening of the insolvency proceedings, or in the preceding year. According to Italian case law and scholars, such provision not only applies to the purchase of receivables but also to debt assumptions aimed at extinguishing debts by offsetting them with the receivables. It should be noted that no set-off is allowed between receivables arisen after the opening of the insolvency proceedings with preexisting receivables.

In light of the above, in the context of reinsurance agreements, according to Italian law it should generally be possible to set-off debts and receivables vis-à-vis the insolvent entity, provided that both were existing prior to the opening of the relevant insolvency procedure.

Originally published in INSOL World – Second Quarter 2018

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions