United Arab Emirates: Trademark Protection : UAE And US Law

Last Updated: 30 August 2018
Article by STA Law Firm
Most Read Contributor in United Arab Emirates, August 2019

Trade Dress Protection

The expansion of international trade and an increase in foreign direct investment is likely to have contributed to the conflict of trademark laws between foreign countries. More recently a fundamental issue arising out of the application of trademark is law the subject matter which it can protect. This article will be on trademark dress protection focusing on trademark protection of a single color or design with or without secondary meaning. The bulk of it will comprise a comparative analysis of Trademark Law in both the USA and the UAE, following this will be a critical analysis of the academic debate. It will delve into both US and UAE legislation along with reviewing the most important literature such as Mires (2013), Kellner (2011), and Bell (1997). Furthermore, it will discuss the limitation of the concept of aesthetic functionality since it is non- functional while, on the other hand, debating the veracity of aesthetic feature as a defense mechanism for trade dress protection of single color since it will increase the saleability of the product. Finally, this article debates over whether copyright or trademark laws are more advantageous for the stability of the computer user interface.

As per the Trademark Law

As per Article 2 of the Trademark law of 1992 of UAE states. "Trademark protection stretches to anything that takes a distinctive form, including names, terms, signs, letters, numbers, drawings, symbols, locations, hallmarks, stamps, pictures, vignettes, notices, packages or any other mark or combination of marks with a distinctive form and in use." Sound can also form part of the trademark. But there are certain restrictions on the registration of the signature such as it cannot be registered if it violates public morality, without any distinctive character, identical to a symbol, etc. On the other hand, according to the United States Trademark and Patent Office (USTPO). "Any word, name, logo, or device or any combination thereof, other than a trade name in its entirely, adopted and used by a person to identify their goods and distinguish them from a comparable good made or sold by others."

Trade Dress Protection- Aesthetic or Utilitarian Functionality

Trade Dress is a legal construct referring to the physical appearance of a particular product such as its color, design, structure, texture, etc. The definition of trade dress protection under the United States Trademark law recognizes trademark on dress and color may be registered once it has secondary meaning. Justice Breyer discovered this concept in the case of Qualitex v Jacobson Products where he held that the color could be constituted as a descriptive trademark if it has secondary meaning as per the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. USTPO which has broadened the horizon of the subject matter protected under trademark. In Qualitex the U.S Supreme Court recognizes trademark protection of single color as long as there is proof that it contains secondary meaning. In another U.S Supreme Court case, Wal-Mart v Samara Brothers the court analyses the doctrine of aesthetic functionality for protection of trademark design without proof of secondary meaning. Later on, as per the U.S district court findings in the Qualitex, it concludes that trade dress or trademark protection of product design is better served with secondary meaning so that users can identify the source of the product.

Academic literature and courts debate that if trade dress has a characteristic of inherent distinctiveness than secondary meaning to be shown. Inc. v Taco Cabana Inc illustrates that both competing restaurants had similar interior décor as well as exterior painted in vivid color with neon stripes. Taco Cabana charged Two Pesos for infringing its trade dress. The Supreme Court held that trade dress could be inherently distinctive and for that secondary meaning is hidden. Henceforth, until today the intentions of the Supreme Court is not clear regarding inherently unique characteristics under trade dress is for packaging or product design.

Furthermore, in the case of Christian Louboutin v, Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) in 2008 Louboutin applied for trademark registration for protection of single red color in the sole of women's footwear contrasting the upper layer of the shoe. The United States trademark registration awarded Louboutin with the "Red Sole Mark" to protect the lacquered red sole on footwear. But in 2011, Christian Louboutin sued the fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent for infringing his trademark of monochromatic red shoes which Louboutin's virtual identity upon the shoes. The District Court for the Southern District of New York held that trademark protection of single red color sole is ineligible since unique colors in the realm of fashion are per se aesthetically functional. Judge Marrero appreciated the concept of trademark protection of the single color in the fashion industry, but at the same time, he proves that it could harm competition in the fashion industry. Hence, he defined the red sole mark to be aesthetically functional and thus cannot be eligible for trademark protection.

Similarly, the US district court in Deere & Co. v Farmhand Inc. held that the protection of color of John Deere Green as per Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C does not fall under the doctrine of aesthetic functionality. Furthermore, even the defendant in the above case contends that if the court gave protection to the color. John Deere green, under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, then it violates Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C 2 and violates section 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 14.

Furthermore, the issue of aesthetic functionality and useful functionality has been debated over the years by prominent scholars and US Supreme Court. Aesthetically function means when the product consists of non- functional element, and hence such product is not eligible for trade dress or trademark protection. The aesthetic function identifies by the use, purpose, cost, and quality of the product. Academic scholars like Michael Mireles raises an issue that generally utilitarian functionality attempts to prohibit trademark law from protecting symbols and devices with some utility and aesthetic functionality directs at symbols and methods which do not have service but have good reason to prevent trademark law from defending them against the interest of the competitors. Henceforth professor Mireles thinks that it is relevant to apply aesthetic functionality test in trademark protection of single color as it is non-functional. Therefore, aesthetic functionality compresses and limits the scope of trademark protection of single color since the subject matter which is non-functional cannot be protected under the trademark law as per the United States legal system.

It is critically argued by academic scholars like Mireles (2013), whether aesthetic functionality restricts the cumulative scope of trademark protection of single color or it uses as a defensive mechanism to have a negative impact upon trademark protection or trade dress protection on the competition. Aesthetic functionality widens the scope of trade dress protection as it is applied to design, shape, color, letters, stamps, and things which are virtually existing. As per Mireles (2013), functionality doctrine is a mess but the concept of aesthetic functionality provides the necessary space required for the public domain, innovation and competition are certain. Increase in trade dress protection has increased the product's saleability. On the contrary, it also limits the scope of the trade dress protection as under aesthetic functionality owner cannot claim rights under a particular mark. Furthermore, features do not identify the source and there is no chance to establish secondary meaning.

Additionally, the UAE federal trademark laws (hence referred to as 'UAE trademark laws' are similar to the federal laws of the US trademarks laws. The UAE trademark office incorporated registration of single color trademark into its legal system in 2007 after the case of Uncle Ben's range of rice production. The color used for Uncle Ben's packaging was a particular shade of orange (Pantone 021C) which is a distinctive key feature for the consumer to identify the course of the product. As per Article 2 of trademark law UAE Mars secured the trademark for Uncle Ben's orange color packaging. UAE trademark office accepted and registered the single-color mark as per class 30 of the classification mentioned in the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). It illustrates that UAE trademark office allows protection of less well-known trademarks too.

From the above comparative analyses between U.S trademark laws and UAE trademark laws, it concludes that the UAE trademark laws have more flexible approach than the U.S. trademark laws even though federal and state laws regulate it. The protection of single color trademark was adopted earlier in the UAE legal system than in the U.S legal system. Please click here to read other interesting articles on trademark registration in Dubai.

Trade Dress Protection for Computer User Interface

The concept of trade dress protection for a computer has been argued by many academic scholars on the issue of whether to apply for trademark or copyright for safety and security of the product. The identity of the computer is through its software. For example, MacBook or any apple product is identified through its IOS software whereas any other laptop has a different operating system such as Macintosh or Windows. It shows that Apple has acquired a unique identification for its computer user interface which makes it easier for the consumer to identify Apple products. The screen and developing a program of the computer is the selling point in the eyes of the customer. Copyright plays a vital role here to protect the outer structure and design of the product but not the whole product. On the other hand, trademark protects composite of the entire product along with its graphics and packaging. Under copyright, neither the manufacturer of the operating system nor the manufacturer of the application program can claim authorship since the whole product is not secured.

Both the academic literature and litigants have expressed that copyright is just for the security of looks and feel of the product and trademark is a better source of protection as it protects overall product which is appealing to the purchasing public.

Kellnar's (2011), opinion is supported by another scholar Bell (1997), who states that virtual trade dress has a broader horizon about the protection of the product than either copyright or patent would offer. Even the consumers trust the quality of the product purely on the aesthetic experience that it provides. Virtual trade dress reflects elements of the trademark. It has been criticizing that virtual trade dress could become a real problem if the current legal and technological trend continues. Therefore, consumers value real trade dress primarily over virtual trade dress as under actual trade dress even the hidden qualities of goods and services are displayed. It is essential to implement uniform standard rules and regulations for the protecting party's trademark rights to adopt international intellectual property law.

This article concludes that trade dress protection of single color or design results in aesthetic functionality, but it broadens the horizon of the subject matter which protects under the trademark. It would increase the scalability of the product since the consumer would be able to distinguish and identify the product with a single color. As critically argued by academic scholars whether the color or design should be trademark protected even if it does not have proof of secondary meaning. As discussed above it would be convenient for the consumer to identify the source of the product if it is with evidence of secondary meaning. Lastly, this article debated whether copyright or trademark protection offers better security for computer user interface. As per the discussion above it can be observed that it is better to trademark the computer product since it will secure the whole composite of the product as opposed to just defending the outlining of the product by copyright.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Hassan Elhais
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Hassan Elhais
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions