European Union: A Brief Guide On The New Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD II)

Last Updated: 17 September 2019
Article by Ramona Azzopardi and Aleksandr Belugin

The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive II, ATAD II [the 'Directive'], is a new EU legislation on hybrid mismatches between EU and third countries. The amendments aim to combat aggressive tax planning used by [mostly] multinational enterprises to avoid tax liabilities.

ATAD I 1, which the Directive amends, used to deal only with hybrid mismatches arising between EU Member States.

Hybrid mismatches are differences in the tax treatment of an entity or an instrument under the laws of two or more jurisdictions. If a mismatch happens, it is neutralised by disallowing a deduction or including the amount in assessable income depending on the situation. The rule on hybrid mismatches aims to prevent companies from exploiting national mismatches to avoid income tax liability or getting double taxation treaty benefits.

By way of an example, company A may perceive the payment made by company B as a dividend payment and thus not taxable, while B perceives it as interest payment and thus deductible. This would constitute a hybrid transfer.

Mismatches are evaluated by comparing tax treatments of the entity/transaction in different jurisdictions.

The Directive states that Member States should use OECD's Report on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ['BEPS'] on Action 2 as a source of interpretation. In fact, if one looks at the Report, some of the definitions and interpretations are taken word for word.

Furthermore, if another Directive already neutralizes the mismatch in tax outcomes then this Directive does not apply.

Notice the pattern of what the OECD's Report refers to as 'defensive actions'. Often times if one jurisdiction does not neutralize the mismatch, then the other jurisdiction can fictitiously add the mismatched sum to the taxpayer's income statement/computation or, alternatively, deny the deduction.

Three Kinds of Mismatch Outcomes

1. D/NI – Deduction or Non-Inclusion

Payments that are deductible under the rules of the payer jurisdiction and are not included in the ordinary income of the payer. This kind of mismatch usually happens when a payment, or a part thereof, is considered as a tax deductible in one jurisdiction and is not included in the income statements in the other jurisdiction.

2. DD – Double Deduction

Payments that give rise to two deductions in respect of the same payment in two jurisdictions.

3. Indirect D/NI – Indirect Deduction or Non-Inclusion

Payments that are deductible under the rules of the payer jurisdiction and that are set-off by the payee against a deduction under a hybrid mismatch arrangement

What does the new Directive provide for?

The Directive expands and now provides rules for:

  • Hybrid permanent establishment mismatches
  • One jurisdiction considers the business to be carried out in a particular jurisdiction through a permanent establishment while another jurisdiction does not consider it to be so. As a result, the business is not taxed where it is truly carrying out its business activity [because the income is not included in its tax assessments] and it also gets the exemptions for profits in the other jurisdiction where it is resident or where the head office is located.
  • Hybrid transfers
  • Type of arrangement involving transfer of a financial instrument where the underlying return is treated from the tax perspective as deriving at the same time by more than one of the parties to the arrangement.
  • Hybrid financial instrument mismatches
  • Happens when financial instruments are treated differently in terms of taxation in different jurisdictions.
  • The Directive allows an option for Member States to exempt certain financial institutions instruments until 31 December 2022.
  • Dual resident mismatches
  • For taxation purposes the taxpayer is considered to be resident in two jurisdictions and it deducts the same sum from both jurisdictions nullifying tax liability.
  • [Reverse] Hybrid entity mismatches
  • Corporate entities are characterized differently in terms of taxation by different jurisdictions. One jurisdiction sees it as transparent while the other does not. This results in non-taxation of the income.
  • Imported mismatches
  • An indirect form of mismatch where the effect of the mismatch is 'imported' into the jurisdiction of a Member State using legitimate regular transactions.

Applicability of the Directive

There are three cumulative elements:

1. Existence of a corporate tax liability

Recital 8 makes a reference to: '...all taxpayers subject to corporate tax in a Member State...'. Hence, the Directive applies to, among others:

  • Permanent establishments; and
  • Arrangements treated as permanent establishments of third country entity residents.

In cases of third countries, the treatment within the EU depends on how the arrangement, entity or transaction is treated in the third country and whether the mismatch rules are applied.

2. Existence of a structured mismatch arrangement

The hybrid mismatch rules are usually not intended to pick-up mismatches that arise due to differences in the value of the underlining payments. Thus, for instance, foreign currency fluctuations that cause the company to incur losses or profits will not usually be deemed to give rise to hybrid mismatch situations. Interesting to note how will this notion interact with the cryptocurrencies and the associated transactions. OECD does mention however that 'money' should be construed widely and include anything that can be converted into money.

Any party to a structured arrangement is subject to hybrid mismatch rules. At the same time, however, a taxpayer will not be considered to be a party to such if there was a reasonable ground to believe that it could be unaware of the hybrid mismatch.

The test to see if the arrangement is structured is an objective one. Intentions of the parties are irrelevant. All the facts and circumstances of the arrangement are considered to see if it was designed with mismatch in mind.

3. Effective control [especially for hybrid entities]

This is in particular relevant to hybrid entities. If a minimum of aggregated 50% of the interest 2 of an entity is held by an 'associated entity/s' then there is an effective control and the rules of the Directive apply.

'Associated enterprise' also includes 3:

  • Entity that is in the same consolidated group.
  • Enterprise in which the taxpayer has 'significant influence' in the management and vice versa.

Further Comments

Three further points to note:

  1. Directive's rules will not apply to the situations where the tax status of the payee is such that it results in non-taxation of the payment. The Directive does not have anything to do with low tax rates or special kind of tax system of a jurisdiction.
  2. Existing tax treaties between Member States and third countries would prevail over ATAD II and taxation rights under the said treaties are not affected.
  3. The Directive provides for certain exemptions in relations to the loss-absorbing capacity for [mainly] the banking sector. This exemption will be applied until December 31, 2022.

ATAD II's Primary and Secondary Rules

The Primary Rule is that the deduction of payments must be denied in the State of the payer in order to neutralize mismatches.

Secondary Rule applies on a condition that the deduction is not already dealt with by the Primary Rule. It allows for the payment to be added to the taxable income of the state of the receiver of such payment. The OECD Report refers to it as a 'defensive rule/action', since it is contingent on the non-participation/passivity of the other jurisdiction.

What is done in case of Double Deduction?

Double Deduction means the taxpayer deducts the same expenses, losses, etc, in the jurisdiction where the transaction originates ['payor jurisdiction'] and in another 'investor' jurisdiction. Note that in situations of permanent establishments or hybrid entities, the jurisdiction where they are established/situated is the payor jurisdiction.

If the Member State is the investor jurisdiction then the deduction shall be denied. So too is the case if the Member State is the payor jurisdiction and the third country investor jurisdiction does not deny the deduction.

Recital 26 of the Directive notes that a Member State should deny the duplicate deduction arising in respect of a dual resident company to the extent that this payment is set off against an amount that is not treated as income under the laws of the other jurisdiction.4

What is done in case of Deduction Without Inclusion?

Deduction Without Inclusion means deductions of a payment in a jurisdiction in which it is considered as being made, without reporting/including that payment for tax purposes.

Note that ATAD II understands that there are different accounting and tax reporting periods so those timing differences on their own will not be considered as mismatches in tax outcomes. However, the taxpayer has an obligation to make sure that the payment is recognized 'within reasonable time' in the other jurisdiction. The Presidency Compromise notes that 'within reasonable time' may be interpreted as a period of 12 months since the end of the payer's tax period.

If the payor jurisdiction is a Member State, it should deny the deduction. Otherwise, in case the payor jurisdiction did not deny the deduction, the mismatched amount is to be added to the 'income' in the Member State which is the payee jurisdiction.

Additionally, ATAD II permits Member States to exempt the application of the income inclusion rules in certain situations.

What is done in case of Non-taxation without inclusion?

If there is an income that the third country permanent establishment does not pay tax on due to hybrid mismatch and the same income is not included in the base income of the head office the Member State [where the head office is located] will require that income to be added to the tax base.

Note that this does not apply in situations where Member States have to deduct due to a double taxation treaty made with a third country.5

What is done in case of Imported Mismatches?

There will be a denial of the deduction in the Member State of the taxpayer, and this will be so even if the payment in question is not directly related to the hybrid mismatch arrangement.

This rule has a broad range of applications to the type of payments such as royalties, rents, interests, etc.

What is done in case of Tax Residency Mismatches?

This concerns dual resident mismatches when a taxpayer is considered as a resident in multiple jurisdictions and deducts the same sum from its tax base in several jurisdictions thereby nullifying its tax liability.

In this situation, according to the Primary Rule, if one of the jurisdictions is in EU, it shall deny the deduction, however, the extent of the denial will depend on how much the other jurisdiction allows the deduction to be set off against the income which is not taxable in both jurisdiction [referred to as 'dual-inclusion income'].

What is done in case of Reverse Hybrid Mismatch?

If an entity is held by an associated enterprise in a jurisdiction which considers the entity taxable, the Member State must ignore the entity's tax transparency and treat it as a resident entity and thus tax it accordingly.

OECD Report defines 'reverse hybrid' as:

'.. any person [including any unincorporated body of persons] that is treated as transparent under the laws of the jurisdiction where it is established but as a separate entity [i.e. opaque] under the laws of the jurisdiction of the investor.'6

N.B: The reverse hybrid rule will start to apply from 1st January 2022.

ATAD II amends the scope of ATAD I

Article 9a [Reverse Hybrid Mismatches] applies to entities which are treated as transparent by the Member State.

ATAD II adds new definitions in Article 2

The term 'hybrid mismatch' got a large expansive definition which includes 7 scenarios where the situation will be considered as a 'hybrid mismatch':

1. Payment under a financial instrument giving rise to deduction without inclusion, provided the payment is not included within reasonable time and the mismatch is caused by different characterization of the instrument/payment.

2. Payment to hybrid entity giving rise to deduction without inclusion.

  • Provided this is the result of a differences in the allocation of payments made to the hybrid entity under the laws of the jurisdiction where the hybrid entity is established or registered and the jurisdiction of any person with a participation in that hybrid entity.

3. Payment to entity with 1+ permanent establishments giving rise to deduction without inclusion.

  • Provided this happens due to differences in the allocation of payments between: (i) Head office and permanent establishment; or (ii) Between 2+ permanent establishments.
  • Provided further that the law of the jurisdictions where entity operates consider it as the same entity.

4. Payment to a disregarded permanent establishment giving rise to deduction without inclusion.

5. Payment by a hybrid entity giving rise to deduction without inclusion.

  • Provided this is due to the payment being disregarded by payee jurisdiction;
  • 'disregarded' – not treated as income under the payee jurisdiction.

6.1 Deemed payment between head office and permanent establishment; or

6.2 Deemed payment between 2+ permanent establishments

  • Giving rise to deduction without inclusion;
  • Provided this is due to the payment being disregarded by payee jurisdiction.

7. When double deduction happens.

ATAD II splits old Article 9

The split is made into:

'9' [Hybrid Mismatches]

If there is double deduction, then:

  • Member State, which is the investor jurisdiction, denies the deduction; or
  • If the investor jurisdiction does not deny the deduction, then the Member State which is the payer jurisdiction must deny the deduction.
  • Denied Deductions are possible to set off against dual inclusion income. Dual inclusion Income is an item which is included in the income under the laws of the jurisdictions where the double deduction arises. OECD report adds that 'An amount should still be treated as dual inclusion income even if there are differences between jurisdictions in the way they value that item or in the accounting period in which that item is recognised for tax purposes.' 7

If there is deduction without inclusion, then:

  • Member State, which is the payer jurisdiction, denies the deduction; or
  • If the payer jurisdiction does not do so, the Member State which is the payee jurisdiction includes into the income the mismatches amount.

'9a' [Reverse Hybrid Mismatches]

Where a Member State would usually treat an entity as transparent, it shall be regarded as a resident of that state and taxed accordingly where non-resident entities holding 50% or more of the voting rights, capital interests or rights to a share of profits are located in jurisdictions regarding that entity as a taxable person where is an exception for collective investment vehicles (being investment funds or vehicles that are widely held, hold a diversified portfolio of securities and are subject to investor protection regulation in their country of establishment).

This is to be applied from 1st January 2022

'9b' [Tax Residency Mismatches]

ATAD II provides that, where dual-residence results in a DD mismatch, the Member State of residence shall deny the deduction to the extent that the other jurisdiction allows the deduction to be set against non-dual-inclusion income. Where both residence jurisdictions are member states, the deduction shall be denied where the taxpayer is not deemed to be resident according to the tax treaty between those two member states


Member States may exclude hybrid mismatches Number 2, 3, 4 and 6 from the defensive secondary rule [amount giving rise to mismatch being attributed in the income of the payee jurisdiction] for hybrid mismatches in cases of deductions without inclusions. It seems that this exemption can be indefinite.

On the other hand, hybrid mismatches from payment of interests under a financial instrument are exempted from both Primary and Secondary rules in cases of deduction without inclusion until 31st December 2022. Article 1.4.b provides the details in relation to when this exemption for financial instruments interests payments can be exempted.

Important dates to note regarding the ATAD II

  • To be published: 31/12/2019 [Except Article 9a]
  • To apply as from: 1/1/2020 [Except Article 9a]
  • To be published: 31/12/2021 [Article 9a]
  • To apply as from: 1/1/2022 [Article 9a]


[1] Directive 2016/1164

[2] Through participation in terms of voting rights, capital ownership or right to receive profits.

[3] In cases of hybrid mismatches

[4] Recital 26

[5] Recital 11

[6] OECD Report, page 56

[7] OECD Report, Page 71

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions