Current filters:  
Litigation
Disclosure & Electronic Discovery & Privilege
Australia
Sydney Criminal Lawyers
Tampering with evidence is an offence under the Crimes Act 1900 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
Law In Order
How Early Case Assessment can assist & the benefits of using review technology.
Law In Order
Discussion about eDiscovery - its primary function, 2 stage process, importance of consulting, role of digital forensics etc
Travis Schultz & Partners
When it comes to personal injuries claims, you need to balance your duty to the court and your duty to your client.
Turner Freeman
A medical negligence case is a claim for compensation for injuries suffered in the provision of medical service.
Colin Biggers & Paisley
Recent case contains summary of Rules of Court permitting orders about preservation & inspection of property & early discovery.
Coleman Greig Lawyers
This recent Family Court decision is a reminder of the cornerstone of parenting cases: the best interests of the child.
Bennett & Philp Lawyers
This recent decision was a reminder to lawyers that their first duty is to the court and the administration of justice.
Canada
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
The recent decision of the Divisional Court in Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. v. Kunicyn has clarified the test for the very narrow future crimes/fraud exception to solicitor-client privilege.
Siskinds LLP
Budgeting, spending and saving are top of mind for many people and businesses this year. In these uncertain times we are all looking for ways to economize.
Stikeman Elliott LLP
In May 2020, the Alberta Court of Appeal (CA) released its decision in Phoa v Ley, 2020 ABCA 195. The decision, upholding an order to strike parts
Stikeman Elliott LLP
En mai 2020, la Cour d'appel de l'Alberta a publié sa décision Phoa v. Ley, 2020 ABCA 195. La décision, qui confirme une ordonnance de radiation de certaines parties d'un affidavit, donne des
Gardiner Roberts LLP
In Niu v. Cao, 2020 ONSC 5407 (CanLII), an Ontario real estate agent was permitted to proceed with a defamation claim stemming from online postings maligning her professional reputation.
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
On September 10, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released long-awaited decisions interpreting and applying Ontario's anti-SLAPP legislation, in the companion cases of 1704604...
Rogers Partners LLP
The Supreme Court of Canada has released two decisions interpreting the test on a motion to dismiss under s. 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act, known as the anti-SLAPP legislation.
Bennett Jones LLP
On September 10, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered judgment in Bent v Platnick, 2020 SCC 23.
Ghana
Robert Smith & Adelaide Law
International Arbitration Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Ghana, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
India
King, Stubb & Kasiva
The Apex Court in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors. brought an end to an ongoing conflict w.r.t. interpretation of Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act...
Khaitan & Co
The conflicted interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 by two judgments of the Supreme Court was referred to a three judge Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal And Ors.[...
Assegaf Hamzah & Partners
International Arbitration Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Indonesia, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
OCT26
Webinar California United States
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Mondaq Social Media