In Lee v. Conagra Brands, Inc., 958 F. 2d 70 (1st Cir. 2020), the court reversed the district court and ruled that a consumer plausibly stated a claim that the label "100% Natural" on Wesson brand vegetable oil violated the deceptive prong of the Massachusetts Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act. This was because 1) the oil contained genetically modified organisms (GMOs); 2) the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) informal policy not restricting use of the term "natural" and not requiring disclosure of GMOs was not preemptive; 3) nor was the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, which prohibits states from establishing any requirement related to the labeling of whether a food is genetically engineered, because the plaintiff did not request a specific court-ordered label; and 4) the defendant waived a claim that the plaintiff's claim was preempted by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. The plaintiff alleged injury based on allegations that GMO-free oil is sold at a premium price. The court also decided that removal jurisdiction was proper under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). The case was remanded for further proceedings.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
