United States:
How Advisers Serving MEPs And PEPs Can Be Conflicted
18 August 2020
McDermott Will & Emery
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The most obvious potential conflict of interest for advisers
setting up or serving pooled employer plans is if their practice is
affiliated with the investments being selected-but there are other
potential pitfalls to acknowledge.
In a recent article, Erin Turley, a partner with McDermott Will
& Emery, said a potential conflict of interest for advisers to
PEPs would be if they were acting as either a 3(21) or 3(38)
fiduciary to help select investments and were paid from plan
assets.
Access the article.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Strategy from United States
Black History Month 2021 | Part 3
Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
The Harlem Renaissance gave the black community a chance to establish an identity and express themselves through clothing. As seen in the 2020 collections of Hermes and Badgley Mischka...
Cross-Border Taxation of Stock Options
Hodgson Russ LLP
Stock options are increasingly a significant component of an international executive’s compensation package. A few of the key questions that should be considered follow.
Black History Month 2021 | Part 2
Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
Butler presents the second in a four-part series discussing important historical African-American figures and developments during the Harlem Renaissance.
