Canada:
Québec Court Of Appeal Recognizes Implied Obligations In Franchise Agreement: What Does This Really Mean?
20 April 2015
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The Québec Court of Appeal has recently released
its long awaited decision in Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico
inc., 2015 QCCA 624 reading into the franchise agreement
an implied contractual obligation on the part of the franchisor to
protect and enhance its brand. Readers of the Consumer & Retail
Advisor blog may be interested in the analysis of this decision by
McCarthy Tétrault's Franchise & Distribution Group:
http://news.mccarthy.ca/en/news_template.asp?pub_code=7080&news_code=2326&single_page=1.
To view the original article please click
here
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Corporate/Commercial Law from Canada
Corporate Update
Carters Professional Corporation
The Ontario Business Registry of the Ontario Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery ("Ministry") released a notice on April 3, 2024 that the Articles of Amalgamation under the Ontario...
Out Of Context, Out Of Luck
Lenczner Slaght LLP
In Coco Intl Inc v Green Infrastructure Partners Inc, the Ontario Superior Court addressed an application ordering the release of $40 million of escrow funds.