United States:
The Supreme Courts Consideration Of The FCA Knowledge Standard (Podcast)
23 May 2023
Arnold & Porter
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
On April 18, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in
Schutte v. SuperValu and Proctor v. Safeway, two
qui tam cases raising significant questions about the
knowledge standard under the False Claims Act.
Arnold & Porter partners Tirzah Lollar, Craig Margolis, and
Christian Sheehan attended the arguments in-person and then
provided their real-time insights into the Justices' line of
questioning, the parties' responses, and what this may mean for
relators and defense counsel.
In this episode of Bona Fide Needs, we present their
discussion, with additional contextual comments by Tirzah
Lollar.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...