According to E&E News (subscription required), FERC yesterday, for the first time, assessed the impacts of a gas pipeline's downstream GHG emissions. (As of this writing, the decision is not yet available on FERC's web site.)
Northern Natural Gas_tagline
Former chair James Danly was unhappy, calling the decision "legally infirm." I question Commissioner's judgment on this one.
Neil Chatterjee provided the Republican vote in favor, saying that he made a pragmatic decision, because the alternative might be a FERC that approves no new natural gas projects.
And why is everyone unhappy? Well, as a representative of the GOP and industry position, I think Commissioner Danly's position speaks for itself. And why might greens be unhappy? Because the Commission still voted to approve the project. Indeed, Chairman Glick specifically noted that:
Analyzing the impacts of the project's greenhouse gas emissions doesn't automatically doom the project.
We'll see how long that position holds - and if it holds at all for large new projects.
To view Foley Hoag's Law and the Environment Blog please click here
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
