United States:
4 Factors Influencing Enhanced Damages After Halo
19 January 2017
WilmerHale
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
This article considers district court decisions on enhanced
damages issued within the first six months after Halo, particularly
focusing on the factors that influence whether enhanced damages are
ultimately awarded. Our article tomorrow will analyze how district
courts have addressed the sufficiency of pleading enhanced damages
after Halo at the motion-to-dismiss stage.
Click here to continue reading
Originally published by Law360
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
USPTO Embraces AI Tools In New Guidance
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States" in the Federal Register (the "Guidance"). As the title suggests...
Breaking Down The EPO's Revised Practice Guidelines
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The guidelines for examination in the European Patent Office instruct on the practice and procedure related to the examination of European patent applications...
USPTO Issues Guidance On Use Of AI-Based Tools
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
On April 11, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued Guidance on Use of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tools (Guidance), which applies existing rules and policies...