United States:
In Third Circuit, All Confusion Is Relevant In Trademark Cases
24 September 2015
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
When evaluating a claim for trademark infringement or unfair
competition under the Lanham Act, courts consider whether or not
the use of the mark is likely to cause confusion. However, courts
seem to sometimes disagree on whose confusion is important, leading
to questions about the purpose of the Lanham Act, and how such
cases should be presented. Schnader attorneys Ronald
Ventola II, W. Drew Kastner,
Stephenie Yeung, and Andrew Chou
examined these issues in "
In Third Circuit, All Confusion Is Relevant in Trademark
Cases" for the New Jersey Law Journal
published on September 8, 2015.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Breaking Down The EPO's Revised Practice Guidelines
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The guidelines for examination in the European Patent Office instruct on the practice and procedure related to the examination of European patent applications...
USPTO Embraces AI Tools In New Guidance
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States" in the Federal Register (the "Guidance"). As the title suggests...
USPTO Issues Guidance On Use Of AI-Based Tools
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
On April 11, 2024, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued Guidance on Use of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tools (Guidance), which applies existing rules and policies...