McLennan Ross Update for Wednesday

What we are seeing

  • As we mentioned here on May 29, 2020, the Government of Alberta announced that the state of public health emergency under the Public Health Act, will not be renewed. In contrast, the Legislature of the Government of Ontario voted on June 2, 2020 to extend its provincial state of emergency to June 30, 2020. This decision came after there were an additional 446 cases of COVID-19 reported by the Ministry of Health. These increases are due in part to an error made in flagging positive cases by two Toronto area hospitals, leading to thousands of Torontonians ignoring social distancing guidelines and gathering in close proximity together in local parks the previous weekend.
  • The extension of the state of emergency may impact the opening up of the Ontario economy, which would benefit all Canadians. Although Ontario has said it still intends to proceed with plans to implement a regional phased approach to reopening, the large cluster of cases in the Greater Toronto Area will almost certainly inhibit the ability of that area to do so.

What we are hearing

  • A key part of allowing Albertans to return to work and to an effective relaunch of the economy is the ability of employees to find childcare. Stage 1 of Alberta's relaunch strategy allowed licensed daycare and out-of-school care programs to reopen as of May 14, 2020. Preschools were permitted to begin reopening as of May 28, 2020. 
  • Unfortunately, the limitations placed on daycare and preschool facilities may make reopening until the fall uneconomical. According to the Province's guidance for these facilities, which can be found here, childcare can only operate in cohorts of 10 people, including staff and children. Cohorts are directed not to mix with other cohorts or be within the same room/space at the same time, including pickups and drop-offs, mealtimes, playtime, outdoor activities, staff rooms, nap time, etc. Although multiple programs can be offered in the same building, each must have separate entrances. Even if these childcare operations can figure out how to meet expenses with reduced enrolment, many have stated they could not do so in the short-term so they will not open for June. 
  • As more and more employers are requesting employees return to the workplace, accommodation of childcare needs will continue to be necessary if other options are not available.

What we are saying

  • The Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta made another announcement regarding its ability to hear contested interlocutory applications effective June 3, 2020:
    • The Court will commence hearing regular Masters Chambers applications (with an anticipated length of 20 minutes or less) remotely via WebEx video and audio. In Calgary and Edmonton, regular Masters Chambers will be held at 10 am every Court sitting day, Tuesday through Friday. In regional centres, Masters Chambers will be available on specified sitting dates. 
    • The Court will also commence hearing regular Civil Justice applications remotely via WebEx video and audio in Edmonton and Calgary. Regular Civil Chambers will continue to be held at 10 am every Court sitting day. 
  • To secure a hearing date, parties are first required to view available sitting dates online. Once parties have determined an appropriate (available and alternate) sitting date, the parties contact the Clerk's Office by sending the draft Application and Form of Order, along with their proposed available and alternate date in accordance with the procedures outlined on the Court's website. 
  • Although this announcement signals that interlocutory matters can be heard immediately, subject to availability, Masters Order #4 granted by the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench is still in effect. Paragraph 10 of that Order states that "[a]ll filing deadlines under the Alberta Rules of Court, including Rule 13.41(4), are suspended until June 26, 2020 with the exception of those Rules applicable to the commencement of proceedings, including originating applications.
  • It therefore appears that applications that were contemplated prior to the declaration of the state of emergency and the closing of the Courts will be able to be argued, but applications to compel parties to complete steps required under the Rules or to seek relief due to a party missing a filing deadline will not yet be available.

McLennan Ross Update for Monday

What we are seeing

  • The Government of Ontario enacted Ontario Regulation 228/20 on May 29, 2020 which introduced temporary changes to Ontario's employment standards legislation, the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The Regulation applies to the "COVID-19 period" which is defined as March 1, 2020 to 6 weeks after the date that the state of emergency declared in Ontario is terminated or disallowed.
  • The key impact of the Regulation is that it expressly excludes a temporary reduction or elimination of an employee's hours of work by the employer for reasons related to COVID-19, or a temporary reduction in an employee's wages by the employer for reasons related to COVID-19, as the basis for a constructive dismissal claim under the Act. The Regulation further directs that any complaint filed under the Act predicated on a temporary reduction or elimination of an employee's hours of work by the employer or a temporary reduction in an employee's wages by the employer shall be deemed not to have been filed if the temporary reductions occurred during the COVID-19 period and were for reasons related to COVID-19.
  • Section 6 of the Regulation also addresses "layoffs" and provides that a person who experiences a reduction or elimination in hours or reduction in wages due to COVID-19 is not considered to be on a layoff. Thus, the Act's termination deeming provisions addressing when a temporary layoff becomes a deemed termination, which would trigger entitlements under the Act, do not apply.
  • It is important to note that the Regulation has no application to Alberta employees and no similar changes were made to the Alberta Employment Standards Code. However, while these changes do not supersede the common law, they suggest a general acceptance that hours reductions related to COVID-19 are a reasonable change and may not be a constructive dismissal at common law. 
  • We have been consistent in our advice that it is unclear how the courts will treat reductions in hours or wages for employees due to legitimate business imperatives created by COVID-19. It is entirely possible that courts will follow the lead of the Regulation and find that an employer's decisions to implement temporary changes to hours or wages in order to survive would not trigger a constructive dismissal claim for affected employees.

What we are hearing

  • In advance of the province's anticipated transition to Stage 2 of the Government of Alberta's relaunch strategy, the Government announced that Albertans could obtain a COVID-19 test without being symptomatic, with residents able to make an appointment by filling out the province's online assessment tool
  • This expansion of testing availability may lead some employers to consider requiring employees to obtain a COVID-19 test before being permitted to return to the workplace or perhaps to be tested weekly. Whether such requirements are permissible, and whether an employee refusing the test can suffer negative consequences, has not been addressed to date as, until now, elective testing was not possible. 
  • We expect, like most legal issues, that an employer's ability to force employees to obtain a COVID-19 test will be very much fact dependent. 
    • The website for Alberta Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) does not address the issue. As opposed to when an employee presents with symptoms or has been in the presence of someone with COVID-19 and there is a legitimate need to test to ensure that the employer is providing a safe workplace for its employees, OHS does not provide the same direct guidance, and requirements apply more generally. 
    • The website for the Alberta Human Rights Commission does contain a COVID-19 FAQ sheet, but it does not address this specific situation. The sheet generally states that employers are required to consider flexible options for employees, consider requests for accommodation in good faith, and be flexible and consider not overburdening the health care system.

What we are saying

  • As we summarized on May 29, 2020, the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta reported in an open letter to members of the Law Society of Alberta and the Alberta Branch of the Canadian Bar Association that a return to normal operations would not be occurring any time soon. Although a limited number of Queen's Bench courtrooms will be equipped with new plexiglass shielding for in-person criminal trials in Edmonton, Calgary, Red Deer, and Lethbridge (with similar steps being contemplated for Provincial Court criminal courtrooms), there was no information regarding when civil trials would resume. 
  • In comparison, other jurisdictions appear to be returning to normal operations at a much quicker pace:
    • In British Columbia, civil trials set to begin on or after June 8, 2020 are currently scheduled to proceed as normal. Interlocutory applications that were already scheduled will be proceeding via telephone conference. The B.C. Supreme Court still does not appear to be accepting new interlocutory applications. 
    • In Ontario, urgent matters can still be argued in person, with criminal matters scheduled to return to normal operations on July 6, 2020 and civil matters tentatively set to return to normal operations in September.  
    • In Saskatchewan, non-urgent interlocutory applications will be heard by telephone commencing on June 1, 2020, with additional application dates added in order to address the various applications adjourned because of COVID-19.
  • Although each province is dealing with its own specific circumstances, we hope that a more expedited strategy can be developed to allow civil matters in Alberta to move forward as quickly and fairly as possible.

McLennan Ross Update for Friday

What we are seeing

  • Premier Kenney announced on May 28, 2020 that Order in Council 080/2020 which declared the state of public health emergency under the Public Health Act will not be renewed.
  • Section 52.1(2) of the Public Health Act allowed the Government, when a declaration of a state of public health emergency had been made, to suspend or modify the application or operation of all or part of an enactment if such actions were determined to be in the public's interest. The Government of Alberta issued over 40 Ministerial Orders to address issues arising from the state of emergency in such areas as privacy, child care programs, community and social services, employment, health, environment, landlord and tenants, transportation and legal proceedings. A listing of all of the Ministerial Orders can be found here.
  • Section 52.1(2) also states that unless terminated earlier by the terms of the Ministerial Order itself or by further Order, the Ministerial Orders all expire 60 days following the end of the state of public health emergency. For employers, this means that the temporary changes to the Employment Standards Code and Employment Standards Regulation, which we summarized here, will expire as well, meaning:
    • Elimination of the unpaid leave of absence for employees who need time off from work because they are caring for children affected by school and daycare closures or self-isolated family members;
    • The shortening of the permitted initial period for a temporary layoff back to 60 days from 120 days;
    • Group termination notice requirements will apply again; and
    • The 24-hour notice requirement for changes to schedules will again be in place.
  • It is possible that some of these changes will be re-implemented by way of formal amendments to the Employment Standards Code and Employment Standards Regulation, which is unlikely to happen prior to the expiry of the Ministerial Order issued under the Public Health Act. It is expected that changes to the Employment Standards Code and Labour Relations Code will be introduced in a June session of the Legislature.
  • On Wednesday in the Legislature, the Premier also noted the following statistics in describing the need to dismantle the economic lockdown:
    • the average age of death in Alberta is 83, while the life expectancy in the province is 82;
    • in Canada, 95% of fatalities from COVID-19 are from those over age 60, 80% are in care facilities, and the risk of death from COVID-19 for people under 65 is 0.006%;
    • younger people, while not completely immune, have a rate of mortality related to COVID-19 that is no higher than their general mortality rate from other illnesses;
    • for most Albertans, the risk of death from other pathogens, accidents, and traffic fatalities is actually higher than it is for COVID-19.
  • These statistics suggest that, in retrospect, Government strategies could have focused more effort on protecting the vulnerable while implementing other measures which would be less disruptive for the general population such as the intensive testing and contact tracing suggested by health professionals.

What we are hearing

  • The Law Society received notice on May 27, 2020 from the Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Solicitor General that Ministerial Order 27/2020, which suspended the running of time for limitation periods and other time periods set by certain listed statutes, will not be extended and, as a result, the time required to take actions covered by those listed statutes will resume running on June 1, 2020. The total effect of the Ministerial Order then is to remove the period of time between the effective date of the Ministerial Order of March 17, 2020 and its expiry date of June 1, 2020 in calculating the time to take steps. For example, a limitation period to commence a claim under the Limitations Act which otherwise would have expired on June 30, 2020 would now be extended to approximately mid-September. Any person who believes that a claim was impacted by this Ministerial Order should confirm with legal counsel.

What we are saying

  • On May 27, 2020, the Chief Justices of the Court of Appeal and the Court of Queen's Bench as well as the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of Alberta delivered a letter to the Law Society of Alberta and the Alberta Branch of the Canadian Bar Association to update lawyers regarding the steps being taken by the Courts to facilitate a return to more regular sittings of the trial courts in response to the Province of Alberta's relaunch strategy.
  • Unfortunately, there was not much information that suggests the capacity of these Courts to hear and resolve matters will be returning to normal in the near future. Of note from the letter is the following:
    • The Court of Appeal has been operating at full capacity and has not had its hearing schedule impacted, due in part to appeals being argued by legal counsel only and there not being live witnesses.
    • The Government of Alberta has committed $27 million in funding to improve the technology used by the Alberta justice system. 
    • The biggest barrier to the resumption of normal operations for the trial courts is the implementation of appropriate sanitation protocols.
    • A limited number of Queen's Bench courtrooms are being equipped with new plexiglass shielding for in-person criminal trials in Edmonton, Calgary, Red Deer, and Lethbridge, with similar steps being contemplated for Provincial Court criminal courtrooms. 
    • The Court of Queen's Bench will not be taking its annual summer recess and will instead conduct as many hearings as circumstances allow through July and August 2020 to reduce the current backlog of applications. 
    • Judicial mediation will also be offered to attempt to resolve exiting court actions.
  • Our takeaway from this letter is that the Courts will be focusing on dealing with criminal and family law claims for the foreseeable future and that civil matters will not be a priority. This may lead some counsel to try to settle matters through more urgent negotiation or lead parties to convert an existing litigation matter commenced via Statement of Claim to be converted to a private arbitration for more timely resolution.

McLennan Ross Update for Wednesday

What we are seeing

  • The Government of Canada has extended the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS), which provides subsidies to help businesses keep employees on payroll or re-hire workers previously laid off, to August 29, 2020. The Government has created an on-line calculator to help determine eligible subsidy amounts.
  • To date, the Government has not stated whether it will extend the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) beyond its initial 4-month time limit. The Government has paid out over $40 billion in CERB payments since being implemented, although a percentage of that amount will be returned to the Government when recipients pay taxes on the amount received and recovers improperly paid benefits. 
  • A concern with the CERB is that it may create too much of an incentive for employees not to return to work. As it is not taxed when paid, and as the benefit is the same $500 per week irrespective of the employee's past earnings, the subsidy in Alberta is roughly the net equivalent of an employee earning $17.00 an hour for a 40-hour work week; $19.00 an hour for a 35-hour work week and over $22.00 an hour for a 30-hour work week. Although some tax will have to be paid on the benefit amount at some point, many entry level employees would prefer to have the cash in hand now (without having to work) and will address the tax issue next year.
  • With the provincial economies re-opening across the country, and employers needing their employees to return to work, even if on reduced hours, it would be counterintuitive for the Government to continue a benefit that gives employees an attractive alternative to returning to work.

What we are hearing

  • On May 25, 2020, the federal Government announced it was in discussions with the provinces to ensure that "every worker in Canada who needs it has access to ten days of sick leave a year." Alberta, unlike some provinces in Canada, does not currently statutorily guarantee that employees must be given paid sick leave. Most provinces that do have such a guarantee only guarantee employees 3 sick day per year. The reaction to this announcement from businesses has been strongly negative. If the leave does not require a doctor's note, it will invariably lead to employees treating the sick leave as additional vacation and taking more time away from work. If, to address this concern, a doctor's note is required to take advantage of the sick leave, it will also place an increased burden on the healthcare system. As employment standards fall within provincial jurisdiction other than for federally regulated industries, it will ultimately be up to the Alberta Government to implement such a program. We expect this program will be limited to sick leave related to COVID-19, at least initially, since that is what it is intended to address, particularly once the CERB ends. 
  • The various Government of Canada programs available to energy producers in Alberta seem to be providing some relief for employers, although many are disappointed by the strings attached to the relief programs or are taking a wait-and-see approach on their effectiveness. These programs include:
    • Interest free loans from the Business Development Bank and loan guarantees of up to $100 million per company from Export Development Canada;
    • The Large Employer Emergency Financing Facility (LEEFF), which provides financing up to $60 million, but with strings such as limits on executive pay, dividends, and share buy-backs;
    • The CEWS that is discussed above;
    • The Well Cleanup Program; and
    • The creation of the methane reduction fund.
  • The CBC has summarized each program that it believes may be of assistance for energy producers and how they have been received to date.
  • As all of Alberta is now at Stage 1, with Stage 2 tentatively set to be implemented in mid-June, it is more important than ever to follow the advice of Alberta's Chief Medical Officer to avoid a step back in the relaunch strategy. The Government of Alberta has also finally followed the direction of this blog by reducing its COVID-19 news conferences from daily to only holding them on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.

What we are saying

  • The federal Government continues to support the operation of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TWF) and the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP) in all Provinces during the COVID-19 pandemic, recognizing the vital role these workers play in supporting food security and other industries critical to the Canadian economy.
  • The Government of Canada recently modified the criteria relating to the Temporary Foreign Worker Programs and published a brief guide to assist employers in understanding these changes. Key components include: 
    • Foreign workers must complete the 14-day period of quarantine upon arrival as outlined under the Quarantine Act, and the employer must ensure the worker does not interact with workers or other persons who are not in quarantine.
    • The worker's period of employment begins upon arrival to Canada and includes the mandatory quarantine period.
    • The employer must pay the worker regular pay and benefits for the quarantine period including a minimum of 30 hours per week at the hourly rate of pay specified on the Labour Market Impact Assessment (LIMA) and/or offer of employment. For SAWP workers, the 14-day period of paid quarantine will be in addition to the minimum 240 hours of pay as specified in the SAWP contract. 
    • The employer cannot authorize the worker to work during the quarantine period, even if requested by the worker, although there are some discrete exceptions, such as providing an essential service. 
    • The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) may be available to workers; however, CERB is not available for the initial quarantine period. 
    • Employers must not terminate the employment contract due to a worker contracting COVID-19.
    • If workers become ill after the initial quarantine period, they may be entitled to either paid or unpaid sick leave, depending on their employment contract and the relevant federal or provincial employment standards, including any newly enacted legislation for job-protected leave because of COVID-19.
  • If employers provide accommodation, there are additional guidelines:
    • Employers must house quarantined workers in accommodations that are separate from those not subject to quarantine.
    • The employer may house workers who are subject to quarantine together, but the housing must enable them to be 2 metres apart from each other at all times, although shared facilities (for example bathroom, kitchen, living space) are allowed.
    • If a new worker arrives at the accommodation facilities during the quarantine period, the quarantine period restarts. 
    • The employer is required to provide cleaning materials. 
    • If a worker becomes symptomatic, the employer is required to immediately provide accommodations that enable the worker to be isolated from others. 
  • The above requirements have created significant changes to Alberta's farming industries. The delays in ensuring workers arrive on time is compounded by the mandatory quarantine period, resulting in anticipated substantial loss of business profits. If your business is encountering challenges with meeting the requirements of the SAWP or TFW programs, consider posting the available employment positions on the Alberta Agricultural Job Connector.

McLennan Ross Update for Monday

What we are seeing

  • Alberta has partnered with the Federal Government to provide up to $5,000,000 in grant funding to agri-businesses to support the training of new employees. This new program will provide support to the agricultural and horticultural businesses and services to help address the impact of COVID-19. The grant is intended to offset the costs of training and ensuring safety protocols are in place for new employees hired from the available domestic labour pool. The government contribution will be up to $2,000 per new employee and up to a maximum of $50,000 per employer. The program is structured through a grant process and administered on a first-come basis. Update: Application information can be found here.
  • Agri-employers may also be interested in other available funding programs through the Canada-Alberta Job Grant, such as the Canada-Alberta Job Grant training program that contributes grant funding to eligible employers of up to two-thirds of the cost to a maximum of $10,000 per trainee per fiscal year. If hiring and training an unemployed Albertan, up to 100% of training costs could be covered, up to $15,000 per trainee. The employer is required to contribute a minimum of one-third of the total training costs for existing employees. More information can be found here.
  • Agri-employers who hire temporary foreign workers may be eligible for funding through the Mandatory Isolation Support for Temporary Foreign Workers Program (MISTFWP), which will assist employers with incremental costs associated with the mandatory 14-day isolation period imposed under the Quarantine Act on temporary foreign workers entering Canada. The MISTFWP will provide a maximum non-repayable contribution amount of $1,500 for each temporary foreign worker. More information can be found here.

What we are hearing

  • The Government of Alberta continues to announce positive trends in its statistics more than one week after the implementation of Stage 1 of its relaunch strategy. Active cases are falling (consistently under 1,000), and new cases recorded over the 10 days have been the lowest since mid-March 2020. 
  • As the cases remain stable and the Chief Medical Officer did not see any concerning increase of cases, the staggered implementation of Stage 1 in Calgary and Brooks has proceeded as scheduled on May 25, 2020 with bars, restaurants, hair salons, and barbershops being permitted to open, with some restrictions. Stage 2 is currently scheduled to be implemented on June 19, 2020, but is contingent on the province's ability to keep infection rates low, which can only occur if the public continues to follow public health guidelines. The focus on infection rates is somewhat curious given the purpose of restrictions was to prevent overwhelming the healthcare system, not stop everyone for getting the virus.

What we are saying

  • The Court of Queen's Bench again expanded its ability to hear applications. On May 19, 2020, the Court announced a process for applications to be heard at the Master level if both parties agreed. The Court announced on May 21, 2020 that it is now accepting applications brought without notice for matters that are beyond the jurisdiction of a Master and must be granted by a Justice. 
  • We have also been informed informally that there will be a significant attempt to expand the scope of matters that can be resolved by the Court of Queen's Bench effective June 1, 2020, notwithstanding the previous announcement on May 14, 2020 that the Court had extended its limitation of hearings for emergency and urgent matters to June 26, 2020. Although no official announcement has been issued, we believe it likely that the Court of Queen's Bench will be formally allowing applications to be heard by telephone or video conference and not require them to be argued in person. Allowing more video conference applications is both sensible and efficient.
  • Expanding the conduct of court matters remotely is consistent with other Ministerial Orders recently issued by the Government of Alberta, including permitting personal directives, powers of attorney, and wills to be witnessed by "electronic methods of communication" where it is impossible or medically unsafe for parties to physically attend before lawyers (more information here) and permitting lawyers to meet with guarantors by two-way video-conferencing, to complete the certificate required under the Guarantees Acknowledgement Act  (more information here).  

McLennan Ross Update for Wednesday

By McLennan Ross Labour & Employment Team What we are seeing
  • The Government of Canada announced that the border with the United States will remain closed for another 30 days to June 21, 2020 for non-essential travel. The border will remain open for commercial traffic and essential workers, as well as illegal immigration that continues unabated at Roxham Road. Prime Minister Trudeau suggested that travellers returning to Canada may be required to self-isolate for 14 days, an idea described by Canada's Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam as a "cornerstone" of Canada's federal pandemic policy going forward.
  • If the 14-day quarantine does become a requirement for travellers, it is realistic to assume that businesses will continue to generally ban non-essential business travel and direct employees to continue to conduct business via telephone and video conference.

What we are hearing

  • The Government of Ontario announced yesterday that publicly funded primary and secondary schools would officially remain closed for the rest of the school year. The Province also issued a Framework for Continued Learning which announced more summer learning programs to increase capacity for student participation and an enhanced learning at home portal to assist students to refresh their learning for the 2020-21 school year. New health and safety protocols will be developed before the commencement of the next school year.
  • In Alberta, the Government had announced last week that no decisions have been made on school operations for the 2020-21 school year. Although the potential opening of K-12 schools is part of Stage 2 of Alberta's relaunch strategy, it will continue to be guided by public health officials who have yet to determine whether schools will reopen and, if so, with what restrictions.
  • Although the reopening of day care, out of school care, and day camps formed part of Phase 1 of Alberta's relaunch strategy, they were limited to cohorts of 10 people, including staff and children. With businesses reopening, access to childcare is a fundamental concern for parents with small children who are being directed to return to the workplace. 
  • The limits on gatherings in Alberta was increased last Friday to 50 people.

What we are saying

  • The Court of Queen's Bench continued to release updates regarding operations on May 19, 2020:
    • The Court announced that effective immediately, in cases where each party is represented by counsel, contested applications that would otherwise be heard in Master's Chambers, including special applications that would normally be heard via a dedicated 1/2 day hearing may be submitted to the Court by desk application with written argument if both parties consent or, in exceptional circumstances, if directed by the Court.
    • The Court provided more details regarding mediation and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms available to parties in Family law disputes. 
  • As is obvious from these announcements, the Court is very concerned about the backlog of cases caused by the Court of Queen's Bench being closed for non-emergency matters and is actively attempting to address that backlog in a manner which still affords all parties the procedural protections historically available to litigants. Other parties may choose to pursue private methods of dispute resolution such as arbitration and mediation.

McLennan Ross Update for Friday

  • The Government of Canada has continued to update its information regarding how additional income received by employees impacts Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) eligibility.
  • The Government updated the CERB to allow employees to earn income of up to $1,000 for each 4-week period and still be eligible for the benefit. What was unclear was whether the requirements that exist under the Employment Insurance (EI) system for employers to make additional payments to workers through a Supplemental Unemployment Benefit (SUB) plan applied to similar top ups for employees receiving the CERB. The Government of Canada confirmed that SUB plans do not apply to employees who are receiving the CERB.
  • Eligible individuals collecting the CERB receive $2,000 for a 4-week period and may earn up to $1,000 from other sources in each benefit period from March 15, 2020 to October 3, 2020. Amounts received by individuals from any employer in excess of the $1,000 threshold will create an obligation to repay CERB amounts in the future.
  • The Government of Canada also added information about whether being in receipt of a severance package would impact CERB eligibility. It had been unclear whether an employee was better off being placed on a temporary leave of absence and defer actual termination (and receipt of a severance amount) until the CERB had been received in full. It has now been clarified by the Government that "[a] severance payment does not impact an individual's eligibility for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit."

What we are hearing

  • The Government of Albert did announce the commencement of Stage 1 of the Province's relaunch strategy on May 13, 2020, which we summarized in an e-alert.
  • Due to elevated incidents of COVID-19 in the Province's two hotspots, the launch of Stage 1 was staggered in Calgary and Brooks with some business eligible to reopen on May 14, 2020 with others, such as hair salons and barber shops, and cafes, pubs, bars, and restaurants at 50% occupancy, having their reopening further delayed to May 25, 2020.
  • In Ontario, the Government announced the timing of limited business openings as part of its reopening strategy:
    • Certain types of businesses could reopen on a restricted basis on May 16, 2020, including golf courses, marinas, boat clubs and public boat launches, private parks and campgrounds, and business that board animals.
    • Other businesses will be able to reopen on May 19, 2020, again with restrictions including retail services that are not in shopping malls and have separate street front entrances, seasonal businesses and recreational activities for individual or single competitors, such as indoor and outdoor non-team sport competitions that can be played while maintaining physical distancing and without spectators (e.g., tennis,t rack and field, and horse racing), animal services (specifically pet care services, such as grooming and training), and regular veterinary appointments, indoor and outdoor household services that can follow public health guidelines (such as housekeepers, cooks, cleaning, and maintenance), non-essential construction, and certain health and medical services (such as in-person counselling).
  • Ontario will be providing an update on school closures and childcare early next week, with the expectation being that, like in Alberta, schools will not reopen this school year and the earliest recommencement will be September 2020.
  • The University of Alberta announced on May 14 that most classes in September 2020 will remain online, with some exceptions. The University of Calgary is taking a similar approach.

What we are saying

  • The Court of Queen's Bench released an update regarding future court operations. The Court issued as new Master Order which addressed criminal, civil and family matters. For civil matters, all hearings scheduled for between June 1 and June 26, 2020 were adjourned indefinitely; however, all special applications scheduled for at least 1/2-day hearing on or after June 29, 2020 were directed to proceed as scheduled, with information regarding filing deadlines for the parties. Further, all filing deadlines under the Alberta Rules of Court continued to be suspended until June 26, 2020.
  • This Master Order is the clearest signal yet that the Court of Queen's Bench is confident that it can start hearing matters in person, albeit with significant restrictions. As special applications are often attended only by the counsel arguing the application with clients only sometimes in attendance, it is reasonable to conclude that these special applications will be proceeding with express direction limiting who can actually be in attendance. Trials will likely now be looked at to see how they can be effectively and fairly run while complying with public health directions. Regular applications, where 20 to 30 such applications are often scheduled in the same morning in the same courtroom and heard one after another, will require significant more logistical planning.
  • A harbinger for the process the Court is considering is an announced Family Docket Court being implemented in Calgary and Edmonton to triage family law files and assist in resolving issues using different processes.
  • In summary form, the Family Docket Court process is that one party files a Notice to Attend indicating the relief sought and the date the filing party requests the matter be heard. The Court will then review the Notice to Attend and will try to resolve the matter by way of a Consent Order or to schedule alternate dispute resolution. If neither of those options are possible, the Court will then schedule the matter for a more formal court hearing. For now, those hearings are limited to desk applications or special applications, but once suspensions are lifted, more options will become available.

Originally published June 3, 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.